Anna Karenina (Penguin) - Leo Tolstoy [388]
III
During his stay in Moscow Levin had again become close with his former university friend, Professor Katavasov, whom he had not seen since his marriage. He liked Katavasov for the clarity and simplicity of his world-view. Levin thought that the clarity of Katavasov’s world-view came from the poverty of his nature, and Katavasov thought that the inconsistency of Levin’s thought came from a lack of mental discipline; but Levin liked Katavasov’s clarity, and Katavasov liked the abundance of Levin’s undisciplined thoughts, and they loved to get together and argue.
Levin read some parts of his writing to Katavasov, and he liked them. The day before, meeting Levin at a public lecture, Katavasov had told him that the famous Metrov, whose article Levin had liked so much, was in Moscow and was very interested in what Katavasov had told him about Levin’s work, and that Metrov would be calling on him the next day at eleven o‘clock and would be very glad to make his acquaintance.
‘You’re decidedly improving, my friend, it’s nice to see it,’ said Katavasov, meeting Levin in the small drawing room. ‘I heard the bell and thought: can it be he’s on time? ... Well, how about these Montenegrins? Born fighters.’1
‘What about them?’ asked Levin.
Katavasov told him the latest news in a few words, then, going into the study, introduced Levin to a short, stocky man of very pleasant appearance. This was Metrov. The conversation dwelt for a brief time on politics and on what view was taken of the latest events in the highest Petersburg spheres. Metrov told them the words, which he had from a reliable source, supposedly uttered on that occasion by the emperor and one of his ministers. Katavasov had heard, also reliably, that the emperor had said something quite different. Levin tried to conceive of circumstances in which both things could have been said, and the conversation on that subject ceased.
‘So he’s almost finished a book on the natural conditions of the worker in relation to the land,’ said Katavasov. ‘I’m no expert, but what I liked about it, as a natural scientist, was that he doesn’t consider mankind as something outside zoological laws, but, on the contrary, regards it as dependent on the environment and looks for the laws of development within that dependence.’
‘That is very interesting,’ said Metrov.