Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences - Alexander L. George [137]
Conclusion
The use of case studies for the development of typological theories, and the use of these theories to design case study research and select cases, are iterative processes that involve both inductive study and deductive theorizing. An inductive, building-block approach to developing typological theories can identify causal paths and variables relevant to a given outcome. Such an approach is particularly useful in new or emerging research programs and in the study of deviant cases. Ultimately, as additional cases are examined, this building-block process can outline an increasingly comprehensive map of all of the causal paths to an outcome. A deductive approach to typological theorizing can help test established theories when they are available and propose integrative theories that incorporate interaction effects and address the problem of equifinality. Combining these modes of inductive and deductive development of typological theories with methods of within-case analysis, particularly process-tracing, can substantially reduce the limitations of Mill’s methods and other methods of comparison.
A greater awareness of the strengths and uses of typological theories and case studies, however, also provides a sharper understanding of their limits. Typological theories, case studies, process-tracing, and congruence tests can only reduce the inferential limits that are similar to those that afflict Mill’s methods of agreement and difference. Left-out variables and measurement errors can undermine causal inferences no matter what methods are used. Case study researchers should be sensitive to interaction effects, but there is no guarantee that they will incorporate and explain such effects adequately. Finally, when low-probability causal relations hold and there are only a few cases, no methods of causal inference work well.
Chapter 12
Case Studies and Policy-Relevant Theory
Political scientists generally agree that research in their field should address important real-world problems.508 This view is expressed not only by international relations scholars but also by scholars in the American and comparative politics fields and adherents of the rational choice approach. Participants in a symposium on “The Role of Theory in Comparative Politics,” for example, agreed that “comparative politics is very much a problem-driven field of study. What motivates the best comparative politics research are puzzles of real world significance… . This problem orientation distinguishes comparative politics