Endgame Volume I_ The Problem of Civilization - Derrick Jensen [244]
376. Account put together from http://www.joric.com/Conspiracy/Center.html (a great site on the conspiracies to kill Hitler); Mason; and Hoffmann, 257-58.
377. Hastings, 227.
378. Ibid.
379. Keegan, 430.
380. Effects of Strategic Bombing, 13.
381. As were aviation fuel refineries: no aviation fuel, no airborne defenses (Dowling, 198).
382. Keegan, 430.
383. I’ve received a large number of letters, by the way, with cogent and radical analysis of the culture from people in the military.
384. And as I did in A Language Older Than Words.
385. I need to say something else here that doesn’t really fit in the book but is crucial to the discussion, and this is a good place to raise it. I’m often asked if I’m afraid of getting arrested or killed by feds because of my writing. I always answer, “Absolutely. But I’m far more afraid of what this culture is doing to the planet and to all of us. It’s as Robert E. Lee said, when asked why he so often attacked even when outnumbered, ‘We must decide between the risk of action versus the positive loss of inaction.’”
I’ll tell you my fantasy, which is that as some fed reads this book, perhaps with an increasing sense of outrage, that instead of ordering me arrested or killed, he disproves me. I would like nothing more than to be shown conclusively that my premises are wrong and that we do not have as difficult a path ahead of us as I know we do.
Show me how a way of life based on the use of nonrenewable resources can be sustainable. Show me how a way of life based on perceiving those living beings around us (and often ourselves) as resources can be sustainable. Show me how civilization can and does benefit landbases. Show me how civilization isn’t based on systematic and widespread violence. (As Ursula K. LeGuin writes, “All civilization does is hide the blood and cover up hate with pretty words” [The Sun, March 2004, 48].) Convince me. I don’t think you can do it.
I mean, by the way, really convince me. I don’t mean throw at me your angry and absurd roadblocks to understanding, tossed at me simply because you are too afraid of the implications not only to allow yourself to examine them but to allow anyone else to examine them either (see R. D. Laing’s Jack and Jill above). I get enough of that already. For example, after a recent talk someone emailed me with this question: “If you don’t like civilization and all it brings, why don’t you and your liberal [sic] friends just move someplace else?” I mentioned this at a talk I did a couple of nights later, and a woman in the audience exclaimed, “By Christ, tell me where I can go! The fucking culture is everywhere. I can’t get away from it. The poisons are in my cells, and they’re in the cells of everyone everywhere. Civilization is killing the planet!”
That email is one example of what I’m talking about. Here’s another. Immediately after another show I did, an older man with a gray ponytail and loose-knit sweater rushed the stage. He demanded, “Do you have a bank account?”
“Why do you ask?”
“Because if you do, I can discount everything you say.”
I stared at him, eyes wide, dumbstruck.
“All through your talk, I kept wondering whether you’re a hypocrite. If you participate in the system, you’re a hypocrite, and then nothing you say matters at all.”
I pointed to his sweater. “Where do you think this was made? And your pants? Your shoes? My shoes? My backpack? Just because we’re immersed in this culture that systematically eliminates alternatives doesn’t mean—”
He cut me off, looked smug. “Ah, ha! So you feel defensive. You do have a bank account then.”
I just shook my head and walked away.
Back to the feds and other cops reading this book. If you don’t like what I say, disprove me. I don’t think it can be done. And if you can’t disprove me, don’t simply act out your denial and kill or arrest me. Join me. Do the real work. Protect your landbase. I’m sure we could use your skills.
I want to be clear, by the way, that