Fifty Degrees Below - Kim Stanley Robinson [116]
Social Science Experiment in Elective Politics (SSEEP)
(notes by Edgardo Alfonso, for Diane Chang, the Vanderwal committee, and the National Science Board)
The experiment is designed to ask, if the scientific community were to propose a platform of political goals based on scientific principles, how would it be formulated, and what would the platform say?
In other words, what goals for improvement in society and government might follow logically from the aggregate of scientific findings and the application of the scientific method to the problem of change?
The platform could conceivably take the form of the “Contract with America” adopted by the Republican Party before the 1994 election (a kind of list of Things To Do):
“Contract with Humanity”
“Contract with the Children”
“Contract with the Generations to Come”
commitment to inventing a sustainable culture
(Permaculture, first iteration
—what science is for)
Some kind of underlying macro-goal or foundational axiom set might have to be synthesized from the particulars of scientific practice and the composite standard model of physical reality expressed by the various disciplines.
1) One axiom or goal might be some form of the “Greatest good for the greatest number” rubric.
Without implying in any way that this “greatest good” could include or justify any planned or accepted structural or permanent disadvantaging of any minority of any size. As should be clear in the wording of the rubric, the greatest number is of course one hundred percent, including also the generations to come.
2) Even in the context of any religious or humanistic anthropocentrism, the life of our species depends on the rest of Earth’s biosphere. Even the utilitarian view of nature as something distinct and subservient to humanity must grant the biosphere the status of a diffused expression and aspect of our bodies. Interdependence of all the components of biosphere (including humanity) is undeniable. An observable, confirmable fact (breathing).
Given some version of these foundational axioms, the scientific community suggests these platform particulars for government:
(preliminary partial list, please add to as you see fit)
“Contract with Our Children”
1. protection of the biosphere:
sustainable uses; clean technologies; carbon balance; climate homeostasis.
2. protection of human welfare:
universal housing, clothing, shelter, clean water, health care, education, reproductive rights.
3. full employment:
Current economy defines 5.4% unemployment as optimum for desired “wage-pressure balance,” treating labor (people) as a commodity and using a supply/demand pricing model. Five percent in U.S.A. = approx. fifteen million people. At the same time there is important work not being done.
If government-insured full employment reduced “wage pressure,” forcing a rise in minimum wages from the private sector, this would help pull millions out of poverty, decrease their government dependence and social service costs, and inject and cycle their larger incomes back into the economy.
4. Individual ownership of the majority of the surplus value of one’s labor.
People create by their work an economic value beyond what it costs to pay them and provide their means of production. This averages $66,000 per year for American workers, a surplus now legally belonging to owners/stockholders.
American workers therefore receive between a fifth and a third of the actual value of their work. The rest goes to owners.
A minimum