God's Fury, England's Fire_ A New History of the English Civil Wars - Michael J. Braddick [457]
Maddison, R. E., ‘“The King’s Cabinet opened”: A Case Study in Pamphlet History’, Notes and Queries, 211 (1966), 2–9.
Mahony, Michael, ‘Presbyterianism in the City of London, 1645–7’, HJ, 22 (1979), 93–114.
Makey, Walter, The Church of the Covenant, 1637–1651: Revolution and Social Change in Scotland (Edinburgh, 1979).
Malcolm, Joyce Lee, ‘All the King’s Men: The Impact of the Crown’s Irish Soldiers on the English Civil War’, Irish Historical Studies, 21 (1979), 239–64.
Malcolm, Noel, Aspects of Hobbes (Oxford, 2002).
Malcolm, Noel, ‘Hobbes, Thomas (1588–1679)’, ODNB, 27, pp. 385–95.
Maltby, Judith, Prayer Book and People in Elizabethan and Early Stuart England (Cambridge, 1998).
Maltby, Judith, ‘Suffering and Surviving: The Civil Wars, the Commonwealth and the Formation of “Anglicanism”, 1642–60’, in Christopher Durston and Judith Maltby (eds.), Religion in Revolutionary England (Manchester, 2006), pp. 158–80.
Manning, Brian (ed.), Politics, Religion and the English Civil War (London, 1973).
Manning, Brian, ‘The Aristocracy and the Downfall of Charles I’, in Brian Manning (ed.), Politics, Religion and the English Civil War (London, 1973), pp. 37–80.
Manning, Brian, The English People and the English Revolution (Harmondsworth, 1976).
Manning, Brian, Aristocrats, Plebeians and Revolution in England, 1640–1660 (London, 1996).
Marsh, Christopher W., ‘“Common Prayer” in England 1560–1640: The View from the Pew’, PP, 171 (2001), 66–94.
Marshall, Peter (ed.), The Impact of the English Reformation 1500–1640 (London, 1997).
Marshall, Peter, Beliefs and the Dead in Reformation England (Oxford, 2002).
Marshall, Peter, Reformation England 1480–1642 (London, 2003).
McEntee, Ann Marie, ‘“The [un]civill-sisterhood of Oranges and Lemons”: Female Petitioners and Demonstrators, 1642–53’, reprinted in James Holstun (ed.), Pamphlet Wars: Prose in the English Revolution (London, 1992), pp. 92–111.
McGrath, Patrick, ‘Bristol and the Civil War’, reprinted in R. C. Richardson (ed.), The English Civil Wars: Local Aspects (Stroud, 1997), pp. 91–128.
McKenzie, Andrea, ‘Martyrs in Low Life? Dying “Game” in Augustan England’, JBS, 42 (2003), 167–205.
McLaren, Anne, ‘Rethinking Republicanism: Vindiciae, Contra Tyrannos in Context’, HJ, 49 (2006), 23–52.
McMichael, J. R., and Barbara Taft (eds.), The Writings of William Walwyn (Athens, Ga., 1989).
McRae, Andrew, God Speed the Plough: The Representation of Agrarian England, 1500–1660 (Cambridge, 1996).
McShane Jones, Angela, ‘“Rime and Reason”: The Political World of the English Broadside Ballad, 1640–1689’, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Warwick (2004).
Medick, Hans, ‘Historical Event and Contemporary Experience: The Capture and Destruction of Magdeburg in 1631’, trans. Pamela Selwyn, History Workshop Journal, 52 (2001), 23–48.
Mendelson, Sara, and Patricia Crawford, Women in Early Modern England (Oxford, 1998).
Mendle, M. J., ‘Politics and Political Thought 1640–1642’, in Conrad Russell (ed.), The Origins of the English Civil War (London, 1973), pp. 219–45.
Mendle, Michael, Dangerous Positions: Mixed Government, the Estates of the Realm, and the Making of the Answer to the XIX Propositions (Tuscaloosa, 1985).
Mendle, Michael, ‘The Ship Money Case, The case of shipmony, and the Development of Henry Parker’s Parliamentary Absolutism’, HJ, 32 (1989), 513–36.
Mendle, Michael, ‘Henry Parker: The Public’s Privado’, in Gordon J. Schochet, P. E. Tatspaugh and Carol Brobeck (eds.), Religion, Resistance and Civil War: Papers Presented at the Folger Institute Seminar ‘Political Thought in Early Modern England, 1600–1660’ (Washington, DC, 1990), pp. 151–77.
Mendle, Michael, ‘The Great Council of Parliament and the First Ordinances: The Constitutional Theory of the Civil War’, JBS, 31 (1992), 133–62.
Mendle, Michael, ‘Parliamentary Sovereignty: A Very English Absolutism’, in Nicholas T. Phillipson and Quentin Skinner (eds.), Political Discourse in Early Modern Britain (Cambridge, 1993), pp. 97–119.
Mendle, Michael, ‘De Facto Freedom, De Facto Authority: