How To Read A Book- A Classic Guide to Intelligent Reading - Mortimer J. Adler, Charles Van Doren [78]
You may also see how the fourth critical remark ties together the three stages of analytical reading of any book.
The last step of structural outlining is to know the problems that the author is trying to solve. The last step of interpretation is to know which of these problems the author solved and which he did not. The final step of criticism is the point about completeness. It touches structural outlining insofar as it con-Agreeing or Disagreeing With an Author 1 63
siders how adequately the author has stated his problems, and interpretation insofar as it measures how satisfactorily he has solved them.
The Third Stage of Analytical Reading
We have now completed, in a general way, the enumeration and discussion of the rules of analytical reading. We can now set forth all the rules in their proper order and under appropriate headings.
I . The First Stage o f Analytical Reading: Rules for Finding What a Book Is About
1. Classify the book according to kind and subject matter.
2. State what the whole book is about with the utmost brevity.
3. Enumerate its major parts in their order and relation, and outline these parts as you have outlined the whole.
4. Define the problem or problems the author has tried to solve.
I I . The Second Stage o f Analytical Reading: Ru les for I nterpreting a Book's Contents 5. Come to terms with the author by interpreting his key words.
6. Grasp the author's leading propositions by dealing with his most important sentences.
7. Know the author's arguments, by finding them in, or constructing them out of, sequences of sentences.
8. Determine which of his problems the author has solved, and which he has not; and of the latter, decide which the author knew he had failed to solve.
164 HOW TO READ A BOOK
I l l. The Third Stage of Analytical Reading: Rules for Criticizing a Book as a
Communication of Knowledge
A. General Maxims of Intellectual Etiquette 9. Do not begin criticism until you have completed your outline and your interpretation of the book. ( Do not say you agree, disagree, or suspend judgment, until you can say
"I understand." )
10. Do not disagree disputatiously or contentiously.
11. Demonstrate that you recognize the difference between knowledge and mere personal opinion by presenting good reasons for any critical judgment you make.
B. Special Crit'eria for Points of Criticism 12. Show wherein the author is uninformed.
13. Show wherein the author is misinformed.
14. Show wherein the author is illogical.
15. Show wherein the author's analysis or account is incomplete.
Note: Of these last four, the first three are criteria for disagreement. Failing in all of these, you must agree, at least in part, although you may suspend judgment on the whole, in the light of the last point.
We observed at the end of Chapter 7 that applying the first four rules of analytical reading helps you to answer the first basic question you must ask about a book, namely, What is the book about as a whole? Similarly, at the end of Chapter 9, we pointed out that applying the four rules for interpretation helps you to answer the second question you must ask, namely, What is being said in detail, and how? It is probably clear that the last seven rules of reading-the maxims of intellectual etiquette and the criteria for points of criticism-help you to Agreeing or Disagreeing With an Author 1 65
answer the third and fourth basic questions you must ask. You will recall that those questions are: Is it true? and What of it?
The question, Is it true? can be asked of anything we read. It is applicable to every