• Choose a category
• All
• Classic-Fiction

• www.lookoutpoint.com/index.html (Real-World Intelligence Inc.)

• www.scip.org (Society of Competitive Intelligence Professionals)

• www.stratfor.com (Stratfor)

• www.opsec.org (Operations Security Professionals Society)

• www.pcic.net (Professional Connections in the Intelligence Community)

• www.fas.org/irp/wwwecon.html (Federation of American Scientists)

FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SERVICES

• www.csis-scrs.gc.ca (Canadian Security Intelligence Service)

• www.cse-cst.gc.ca/cse/english/home-1.html(Communications Security Establishment, Canada)

• www.asio.gov.au (Australian Security Intelligence Office)

• www.asis.gov.au (Australian Secret Intelligence Service)

• www.ona.gov.au (Office of National Assessments, Australia)

• www.defence.gov.au/dio (Defence Intelligence Organisation. Australia)

SPECIAL REPORTS

• www.carnegie.org/deadly/0697warning.htm (“The Warning-Response Problem and Missed Opportunities in Preventive Diplomacy,” New York: Carnegie Commission on Preventing Deadly Conflict, 1997)

• www.fas.org/irp/congress/1998_cr/s980731-rumsfeld.htm (U.S. Senate, “The Rumsfeld Commission Report,” Congressional Record, daily ed., 105th Cong., 2d sess., July 31, 1998)

• www.seas.gwu.edu/nsarchive/news/19980222.htm (“Inspector General’s Survey of the Cuban Operation and Associated Documents,” CIA report on the Bay of Pigs)

• www.fas.org/irp/cia/product/jeremiah.html (Comments of Adm. David Jeremiah on his investigation into actions taken by the intelligence community leading up to the Indian nuclear test of 1998)

• www.fas.org/irp/cia/product/cocaine2/index.html (CIA inspector general report: “Report of Investigation: Allegations of Connections between CIA and the Contras in Cocaine Trafficking to the United States”)

• www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/drugs/front.htm (“Special Report: CIA, Contras, and Drugs: Questions Linger,” Washington Post)

PRIVATE ORGANIZATIONS

• www.iafie.org (International Association for Intelligence Education)

• www.afio.com (Association of Former Intelligence Officers)

• www.nmia.org (National Military Intelligence Association)

• www.aochq.org (Association of Old Crows)

• www.opsec.org (Operations Security Professionals Society)

• www.afcea.com (Armed Forces Communications and Electronics Association)

• www.cloakanddagger.com/dagger (Cloak and Dagger Books)

• intelligence-history.wiso.uni-erlangen.de (International Intelligence History Association)

APPENDIX 2

MAJOR INTELLIGENCE REVIEWS OR PROPOSALS

This appendix, which lists some of the most important reviews or proposals for change in the intelligence community, is based on a 1996 Congressional Research Service report, Proposals for Intelligence Reorganization, 1949-1996, by Richard A. Best Jr. The synopses offer insight into the major concepts that have been put forth over the years. However, they do not capture the many proposals made by individuals.

Eberstadt Report, 1945. Laid the basic groundwork for what became the National Security Act of 1947, creating the National Security Council (NSC), a de jure director of central intelligence (DCI), and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). Also created a unified defense structure, as opposed to separate War and Navy Departments.

First Hoover Commission, 1949. Raised concerns about the lack of coordination among the CIA, the military, and the State Department, resulting in duplication and some biased estimates. Urged a more central role for the CIA in national intelligence.

Dulles-Jackson-Correa Report, 1949. Recommended that the DCI concentrate on community-wide issues, with a subordinate running day-to-day CIA operations.

Doolittle Report. 1954. Urged more effective espionage, counterespionage, and covert action to deal with the Soviet threat and noted the need for technical intelligence to overcome impediments to human intelligence (HUMINT) in the Soviet bloc.

Taylor Commission, 1961. Offered an assessment of the Bay of Pigs invasion that criticized all agencies