Online Book Reader

Home Category

Letters on England [34]

By Root 1624 0
me about the

name I give it?"



Vortices may be called an occult quality, because their existence

was never proved. Attraction, on the contrary, is a real thing,

because its effects are demonstrated, and the proportions of it are

calculated. The cause of this cause is among the Arcana of the

Almighty.





"Precedes huc, et non amplius."



(Thus far shalt thou go, and no farther.)







LETTER XVI.--ON SIR ISAAC NEWTON'S OPTICS







The philosophers of the last age found out a new universe; and a

circumstance which made its discovery more difficult was that no one

had so much as suspected its existence. The most sage and judicious

were of opinion that it was a frantic rashness to dare so much as to

imagine that it was possible to guess the laws by which the

celestial bodies move and the manner how light acts. Galileo, by

his astronomical discoveries, Kepler, by his calculation, Descartes

(at least, in his dioptrics), and Sir Isaac Newton, in all his

works, severally saw the mechanism of the springs of the world. The

geometricians have subjected infinity to the laws of calculation.

The circulation of the blood in animals, and of the sap in

vegetables, have changed the face of Nature with regard to us. A

new kind of existence has been given to bodies in the air-pump. By

the assistance of telescopes bodies have been brought nearer to one

another. Finally, the several discoveries which Sir Isaac Newton

has made on light are equal to the boldest things which the

curiosity of man could expect after so many philosophical novelties.



Till Antonio de Dominis the rainbow was considered as an

inexplicable miracle. This philosopher guessed that it was a

necessary effect of the sun and rain. Descartes gained immortal

fame by his mathematical explication of this so natural a

phenomenon. He calculated the reflections and refractions of light

in drops of rain. And his sagacity on this occasion was at that

time looked upon as next to divine.



But what would he have said had it been proved to him that he was

mistaken in the nature of light; that he had not the least reason to

maintain that it is a globular body? That it is false to assert

that this matter, spreading itself through the whole, waits only to

be projected forward by the sun, in order to be put in action, in

like manner as a long staff acts at one end when pushed forward by

the other. That light is certainly darted by the sun; in fine, that

light is transmitted from the sun to the earth in about seven

minutes, though a cannonball, which were not to lose any of its

velocity, could not go that distance in less than twenty-five years.

How great would have been his astonishment had he been told that

light does not reflect directly by impinging against the solid parts

of bodies, that bodies are not transparent when they have large

pores, and that a man should arise who would demonstrate all these

paradoxes, and anatomise a single ray of light with more dexterity

than the ablest artist dissects a human body. This man is come.

Sir Isaac Newton has demonstrated to the eye, by the bare assistance

of the prism, that light is a composition of coloured rays, which,

being united, form white colour. A single ray is by him divided

into seven, which all fall upon a piece of linen, or a sheet of

white paper, in their order, one above the other, and at unequal

distances. The first is red, the second orange, the third yellow,

the fourth green, the fifth blue, the sixth indigo, the seventh a

violet-purple. Each of these rays, transmitted afterwards by a

hundred other prisms, will never change the colour it bears; in like

manner, as gold, when completely purged from its dross, will never

change afterwards in the crucible. As a superabundant proof that

each of these elementary rays has inherently in itself that which

forms its colour to the eye, take a small piece of yellow
Return Main Page Previous Page Next Page

®Online Book Reader