Nemesis - Agatha Christie [49]
‘Very interesting,’ said Miss Marple. ‘Yes, I call that very interesting. After all, your friend — I mean your Governor — was a man of experience, a man who loved justice. He was a man whom you’d be willing to listen to. Presumably then, you did listen to him.’
‘Yes,’ said Professor Wanstead, ‘I was deeply interested. I saw the subject, as I will call him, I approached him from several different attitudes. I talked to him, I discussed various changes likely to occur in the law. I told him it might be possible to bring down a lawyer, a Queen’s Counsel, to see what points there might be in his favour, and other things. I approached him as a friend but also as an enemy so that I could see how he responded to different approaches, and I also made a good many physical tests, such as we use very frequently nowadays. I will not go into those with you because they are wholly technical.’
‘Then what did you think in the end?’
‘I thought,’ said Professor Wanstead, ‘I thought my friend was likely to be right. I did not think that Michael Rafiel was a murderer.’
‘What about the earlier case you mentioned?’
‘That told against him, of course. Not in the jury’s mind, because of course they did not hear about that until after the judge’s summing up, but certainly in the judge’s mind. It told against him, but I made a few enquiries myself afterwards. He had assaulted a girl. He had conceivably raped her, but he had not attempted to strangle her and in my opinion — I have seen a great many cases which come before the Assizes — it seemed to me highly unlikely that there was a very definite case of rape. Girls, you must remember, are far more ready to be raped nowadays than they used to be. Their mothers insist, very often, that they should call it rape. The girl in question had had several boy-friends who had gone further than friendship. I did not think it counted very greatly as evidence against him. The actual murder case — yes, that was undoubtedly murder — but I continued to feel by all tests, physical tests, mental tests, psychological tests, none of them accorded with this particular crime.’
‘Then what did you do?’
‘I communicated with Mr Rafiel. I told him that I would like an interview with him on a certain matter concerning his son. I went to him. I told him what I thought, what the Governor thought, that we had no evidence, that there were no grounds of appeal, at present, but that we both believed that a miscarriage of justice had been committed. I said I thought possibly an enquiry might be held, it might be an expensive business, it might bring out certain facts that could be laid before the Home Office, it might be successful, it might not. There might be something there, some evidence