• Choose a category
• All
• Classic-Fiction

By Root 1674 0

flame needs a little heat.” In the logic of war rhetoric, to be “hot” is to be unable to disguise oneself behind masks of secrecy. It is a place of vulnerability and embarrassment, an exposure to all forms of criticism. It was more important for Kerouac to be sincere than “cool.” In 1949, he laments, “Resuming true serious work I find that I have grown lazy in my heart.” He is frustrated with the lack of discipline he observes in his peers and wonders, “Is this the way the world is going to end—in indifference?” When asked by one interviewer what he was looking for, Kerouac answered that he was “waiting for God to show his face.” If on a national level, “truth” was a politicized umbrella term for a particular form of ideology, for Kerouac, writing what he called his “true-story novels” was an act enmeshed in answering the “adolescent question of ‘why do men go on living.’”

On the Road speaks to some urge of its readers, giving them the vocabulary with which to reimagine their daily lives in ways that are felt organically rather than fully articulated. It is something like the sensation of suddenly being shocked by the sight of a large, full moon hovering almost too low to notice, and wondering if anyone else sees it. You are a lucky participant receiving privileged information. As Douglas argues, “In the age that invented the idea of classified information, Kerouac’s effort was to declassify the secrets of the human body and soul.” Kerouac was always interested in honesty, especially to himself, at whatever cost, and often this meant offering a picture of possibility rather than providing a direct guide. In one of the most memorable parts of On the Road, Sal understands that Dean silently acknowledges how “I’d never committed myself before with regard to his burdensome existence,” and the two men find themselves in an awkward moment of pathos and discovery: “We both felt uncertain of something.” After this quiet exchange in which something “clicked in both of us” (in the scroll, Kerouac writes “both of our souls”), the two men resume their journey. It is what is not said or done that drives On the Road, what cannot be contained, categorized, or commodified. Sal’s newfound commitment to his friend resolves itself in a question about Dean: “He was BEAT—the root, the soul of beatific. What was he knowing?” Rather than wonder “What did he know?,” a more conventional approach to the ways in which we mine each other for ideas that we convert into personal capital, Kerouac’s use of the present participle indicates the open-endedness of knowledge—a creative space of contestation that begins at the edges of subjective experience.

What is so striking at first about reading the scroll manuscript, aside from seeing the original names, the sexually frank language, and certain sections that were ultimately cut, is how little the language actually differs from the published text as a whole. But the feeling of reading it is altogether new. The processes of reading and writing emerge as crucial artistic practices. Kerouac lets us toy with the option that, as he writes in a journal entry, “It’s not the words that count, but the rush of what is said.” In a Village Voice review of The Dharma Bums, Ginsberg discusses On the Road and describes feeling a “sadness that this was never published in its most exciting form—its original discovery—but hacked and punctuated and broken—the rhythms and swing of it broken—by presumptuous literary critics in publishing houses.” The On the Road scroll represents the early stage of Kerouac’s increasingly innovative literary technique. In a letter to Ginsberg the following year, Kerouac wrote that while “sketching,” a method suggested by his friend Ed White, he produced writing that wavered between lunatic confessionals and brilliant prose. He composed the version of On the Road that eventually became Visions of Cody in this style, much to the dismay of publishers, who repeatedly accused him of incoherency. The sense of skating on the edges of consciousness and sanity in language is felt to a much greater