Ordeal by Innocence - Agatha Christie [34]
“Can’t look after her properly here,” she’d said.
So Mary had been taken back to their suite at the hotel. The child had obviously enjoyed the soft bed and the luxurious bathroom. Rachel had bought her new clothes. Then the moment had come when the child had said:
“I don’t want to go home. I want to stay here with you.”
Rachel had looked at him, looked at him with a sudden passion of longing and delight. She had said to him as soon as they were alone:
“Let’s keep her. It’ll easily be arranged. We’ll adopt her. She’ll be our own child. That woman’ll be only too pleased to be rid of her.”
He had agreed easily enough. The child seemed quiet, well-behaved, docile. She’d obviously no feeling for the aunt and uncle with whom she lived. If this would make Rachel happy, they’d go ahead. Lawyers were consulted, papers were signed and henceforth Mary O’Shaughnessy was known as Mary Argyle, and sailed with them for Europe. He had thought that at last poor Rachel would be happy. And she had been happy. Happy in an excited, almost feverish kind of way, doting on Mary, giving her every kind of expensive toy. And Mary had accepted placidly, sweetly. And yet, Leo thought, there had always been something that disturbed him a little. The child’s easy acquiescence. Her lack of any kind of homesickness for her own place and people. True affection, he hoped, would come later. He could see no real signs of it now. Acceptance of benefits, complacence, enjoyment of all that was provided. But of love for her new adopted mother? No, he had not seen that.
It was from that time onwards, Leo thought, that he had somehow managed to slip to the background of Rachel Argyle’s life. She was a woman who was by nature a mother, not a wife. Now with the acquiring of Mary, it was as though her maternal longings were not so much fulfilled as stimulated. One child was not enough for her.
All her enterprises from now on were connected with children. Her interest lay in orphanages, in endowments for crippled children, in cases of backward children, spastics, orthopaedics—always children. It was admirable. He felt all along that it was very admirable, but it had become the centre of her life. Little by little he began to indulge in his own activities. He began to go more deeply into the historical background of economics, which had always interested him. He withdrew more and more into his library. He engaged in research, in the writing of short, well-phrased monographs. His wife, busy, earnest, happy, ran the house and increased her activities. He was courteous and acquiescent. He encouraged her. “That is a very fine project, my dear.” “Yes, yes, I should certainly go ahead with that.” Occasionally a word of caution was slipped in. “You want, I think, to examine the position very thoroughly before you commit yourself. You mustn’t be carried away.”
She continued to consult him, but sometimes now it was almost perfunctory. As time went on she was more and more an authoritarian. She knew what was right, she knew what was best. Courteously he withdrew his criticism and his occasional admonitions.
Rachel, he thought, needed no help from him, needed no love from him. She was busy, happy, terrifically energetic.
Behind the hurt that he could not help feeling, there was also, queerly enough, a sense of pity for her. It was as though he knew that the path she was pursuing might be a perilous one.
On the outbreak of war in 1939, Mrs. Argyle’s activities were immediately redoubled. Once she had the idea of opening a war nursery for children from the London slums, she was in touch with many influential people in London. The Ministry of Health was quite willing to co-operate and she had looked for and found a suitable house for her purpose. A newly built, up-to-date