Piracy_ The Intellectual Property Wars from Gutenberg to Gates - Adrian Johns [53]
As with print, so with medicines: London did not lack for apothecaries prepared to issue their own proclaimed versions of a successful product. Two brothers named Francis and George Moult came forward to compete with Grew. Theywere by no means unknowns. George Moult was a fellow of the Royal Society, having first been proposed as its operator back in 1685.1' And in the background to their venture lay a tangled story of ambition and rivalry. At first, apparently, George had agreed to buy Grew's salt legitimately. But Francis had sought to steal a march on George by securing a cheaper price for himself. Grew had refused, at which point Francis decided to make his own salt by "prying into Dr. Grew's Method." He went to Acton, observed Tramel's works, and tried to bribe Tramel into breaking his agreement with Grew. When this too failed, he set up his own illicit plant in Shooter's Hill, a demimonde and semirural district southeast of Greenwich, with a retail and wholesale outlet to the east of St. Paul's in Watling Street. He was soon joined by a reconciled George. Their operation quickly ramped up. It became capable of producing enough salt to swamp the market in Ireland and Scotland as well as in England. There was evidently a distribution network for "counterfeit" salts that extended at least that far.
The Moults simply ignored any right that Grew might have as a result of his priority. Legally speaking, after all, no such right existed. But the real question soon became one of chemistry, not law or even morality How did a customer know if their rival salt was in fact the same as Grew's? For Grew himself reacted by mounting a seemingly self-contradictory argument: that the Moults not merely counterfeited his salt, but produced something that was actually different. Not only did they "invade his Right," Grew said, but in doing so they "falsif{ied} the Medicine." Indeed, in some ways Grew thought them more worrisome if their salt did not match his original, since who knew what awful side effects it might then produce? His salt would surely get the blame for them. "Counterfeit Salts," his camp said, put at risk both the propriety of medicine and its political economy-not to mention the health of patients. The contest for authorship thus became a contest for the identity of the substance. Unfortunately for Grew, though, identifying a substance was not easy for anyone to do, let alone a patient. He was left proclaiming that the true salt could be clearly distinguished from "counterfeits" by its bitter taste. That is, you had to take some. At that point, your own body became an instrument