Scenes From Provincial Life - J. M. Coetzee [152]
No. No, I wouldn’t.
Exactly. And John wasn’t exactly a snappy dresser himself. One pair of good trousers, three plain white shirts, one pair of shoes: a real child of the Depression. But let me get back to my story.
For supper that night I made a simple lasagne. Pea soup, lasagne, ice cream: that was the menu, bland enough for a two-year-old. The lasagne was sloppier than it should have been because it was made with cottage cheese instead of ricotta. I could have made a second dash to the shops for ricotta, but on principle I did not, just as on principle I did not change my outfit.
What did we talk about over supper? Nothing much. I concentrated on feeding Chrissie – I didn’t want her to feel neglected. And John was not a great talker, as you must know.
I don’t know. I never met him in the flesh.
You never met him? I’m surprised to hear that.
I never sought him out. I never even corresponded with him. I thought it would be better if I had no sense of obligation towards him. It would leave me free to write what I wished.
But you sought me out. Your book is going to be about him yet you chose not to meet him. Your book is not going to be about me yet you asked to meet me. How do you explain that?
Because you were a figure in his life. You were important to him.
How do you know that?
I am just repeating what he said. Not to me, but to lots of people.
He said that I was an important figure in his life? I am surprised. I am gratified. Gratified not that he should have thought so – I agree, I did have an impact on his life – but that he should have said so to other people.
Let me make a confession. When you first contacted me, I nearly decided to turn you down, not to speak to you. I thought you would be some busybody, some academic newshound who had come upon a list of John’s women, his conquests, and would now be going down the list, ticking off the names, hoping to get some dirt on him.
You don’t have a high opinion of academic researchers.
No, I don’t. Which is why I have tried to make it clear to you that I was not one of his conquests. If anything, he was one of mine. But tell me – I’m curious – to whom did he say that I was important?
To various people. In letters. He doesn’t name you, but you are easy enough to identify. Also, he kept a photograph of you. I came across it among his papers.
A photograph! Can I see it? Do you have it with you?
I’ll make a copy and send it.
Yes, of course I was important to him. He was in love with me, in his way. But there is an important way of being important, and an unimportant way, and I have my doubts that I made it to the important important level. I mean, he never wrote about me. I never entered his books. Which to me suggests that I never quite flowered within him, never quite came to life.
[Silence.]
No comment? You have read his books. Where in his books do you find traces of me?
I can’t answer that. I don’t know you well enough to say. Don’t you recognize yourself in any of his characters?
No.
Perhaps you are in his books in a more diffuse way, not immediately detectable.
Perhaps. But I would have to be convinced of that. Shall we go on? Where was I?
Supper. Lasagne.
Yes. Lasagne. Conquests. I fed him lasagne and then I completed my conquest of him. How explicit do I need to be? Since he is dead, it can make no difference to him, any indiscreetness on my part. We used the marital bed. If I am going to desecrate my marriage, I thought, I may as well do so thoroughly. And a bed is more comfortable than the sofa or the floor.
As for the experience itself – I mean the experience of infidelity, which is what the experience was, predominantly, for me – it was stranger than I expected, and then over before I could get accustomed to the strangeness. Yet it was exciting, no doubt about that, from start to finish. My heart did not stop hammering. Not something I will forget, ever. I mentioned Henry James. There are plenty of