• Choose a category
• All
• Classic-Fiction

Zuk, M. 2002. Sexual Selections: What We Can and Can't Learn about Sex from Animals. Berkeley: University of California Press.

5. Sperm and Eggs on Six Legs

Ben-Ari, E. T. 2000. Choosy females. BioScience 50: 7–12.

Birkhead, T. R. 2000. Defining and demonstrating postcopulatory female choice—Again. Evolution 54: 1057–1060.

Birkhead, T. R., and T. Pizzari. 2002. Postcopulatory sexual selection. Nature Reviews Genetics 3: 262–273.

Bjork, A., Dallai, R., and S. Pitnick. 2007. Adaptive modulation of sperm production rate in Drosophila bifurca, a species with giant sperm. Biology Letters 3: 517–519.

Briceño, R. D., W. G. Eberhard, and A. S. Robinson. 2007. Copulation behaviour of Glossina pallidipes (Diptera: Muscidae) outside and inside the female, with a discussion of genitalic evolution. Bulletin of Entomological Research 97: 471–488.

Chapman, T. 2008. The soup in my fly: Evolution, form and function of seminal fluid proteins. PLoS Biology 6: 1379–1382.

Córdoba-Aguilar, A. 2006. Sperm ejection as a possible cryptic female choice mechanism in Odonata (Insecta). Physiological Entomology 31: 146–153.

Eberhard, W. G. 1991. Copulatory courtship and cryptic female choice in insects. Biological Reviews 66: 1–31.

Eberhard, W. G., and C. Cordero. 1995. Sexual selection by cryptic female choice on male seminal products—A new bridge between sexual selection and reproductive physiology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 10: 493–496.

Engqvist, L. 2007. Nuptial gift consumption influences female remating in a scorpionfly: Male or female control of mating rate? Evolutionary Ecology 21: 49–61.

Fedina, T. Y. 2006. Cryptic female choice during spermatophore transfer in Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Journal of Insect Physiology 53: 93–98.

Holland, B., and W. R. Rice. 1997. Cryptic sexual selection—More control issues. Evolution 51: 321–324.

Holman, L., and R. R. Snook. 2008. A sterile sperm caste protects brother fertile sperm from female-mediated death in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Current Biology 18: 292–296.

Jagadeeshan, S., and R. S. Singh. 2006. A time-sequence functional analysis of mating behaviour and genital coupling in Drosophila: Role of cryptic female choice and male sex-drive in the evolution of male genitalia. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 19: 1058–1070.

Joly, D., C. Bressac, and D. Lachaise. 1995. Disentangling giant sperm. Nature 377: 202.

Kullmann, H., and K. P. Sauer. 2008. Mating tactic dependent sperm transfer rates in Panorpa similis (Mecoptera; Panorpidae): A case of female control? Ecological Entomology 34: 153–157.

LaMunyon, C. W., and T. Eisner. 1993. Postcopulatory sexual selection in an arctiid moth (Utetheisa ornatrix). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 90: 4689–4692.

Martin, O., and M. Demont. 2008. Reproductive traits: Evidence for sexually selected sperm. Current Biology 18: R79-R81.

Miller, G. T., and S. Pitnick. 2002. Sperm-female coevolution in Drosophila. Science 298: 1230–1233.

Parker, G. 1970. Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Biological Reviews 45: 525–567.

Pattarini, J. M., W. T. Starmer, A. Bjork, and S. Pitnick. 2006. Mechanisms underlying the sperm quality advantage in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 60: 2064–2080.

Peretti, A., W. G. Eberhard, and R. D. Briceno. 2006. Copulatory dialogue: Female spiders sing during copulation to influence male genitalic movements. Animal Behavior 72: 413–421.

Pitnick, S., G. S. Spicer, and T. A. Markow. 1995. How long is a giant sperm? Nature 375: 109.

Pizzari, T. 2006. Evolution: The paradox of sperm leviathans. Current Biology 16: R462-R464.

Simmons, L. W. 2001. Sperm Competition and Its Evolutionary Consequences in the Insects. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

———. 2005. The evolution of polyandry: Sperm competition, sperm selection, and offspring viability. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 36: 125–146.

Simmons, L. W., and F. Garcia-González. 2008. Evolutionary reduction in testes size and competitive fertilization success in response