Online Book Reader

Home Category

Starman_ The Truth Behind the Legend of Yuri Gagarin - Jamie Doran [109]

By Root 466 0
such an ordinary problem should have been survivable. If backwash was a factor on March 27, Serugin should have been able to stabilize the MiG without too much difficulty. Major-General Yuri Khulikov, a former Air Force Chief of Flight Security Services, points out that the MiG-15 had been intensively flight-tested under simulated backwash conditions. Given a reasonable altitude for safety, any averagely experienced pilot should have been able to regain control. In January 1996 Khulikov gave an interview to Moscow News, in which he focused rather harshly on ‘pilot error’ as an explanation for the crash. ‘Even if Gagarin and Serugin got into a vortex stream, the MiG should have been recoverable. Such a vortex doesn’t much affect the engine. I’d like to point out, this conclusion was reached after a very stringent series of tests . . . Gagarin wasn’t at all prepared for such conditions . . . You must understand what the name “Gagarin” meant in our country at that time. It was a symbol of the victory of socialism in space. It seems that the First Cosmonaut couldn’t be capable of making mistakes.’10

But Khulikov has an axe to grind, since his loyalties lie with the original members of the 1968 investigating commission and those senior officers responsible for general air-traffic control at that time. Notably he forgot to mention that the MiG-15 and many other planes used in vortex recovery tests had never been fitted with drop-tanks because – and this is where the military logic goes round in circles – it was forbidden to fly drop-tanks in such extreme manoeuvres. Quite simply it never occurred to anyone to test MiG-15 training craft under the most severe flying conditions with the tanks attached, because it would have been much too dangerous, even for the most experienced test pilot.

Clearly a backwash hitting a MiG with drop-tanks (as flown by Gagarin and Serugin) would have been more of a hazard than Major-General Khulikov likes to admit.

Alexei Leonov goes much further, insisting that it was not just ordinary backwash from another MiG, but a powerful supersonic shockwave from a brand-new, high-performance fighter that slammed into Gagarin’s and Serugin’s plane like a solid brick wall.

Leonov was always firmly convinced that the two bangs he had heard after he landed his helicopter at Kerzatch were made by two entirely different phenomena. The MiG-15UTI was fast, but far from supersonic. The distant bangs may have sounded faint from where he was standing at the time, but he was sure they were caused by an explosion and an additional supersonic boom. Therefore another, and much faster, aircraft must have entered the same airspace at the wrong moment. But when Leonov tried to persuade his fellow investigators to explore this theory, ‘all my attempts were stopped by some invisible wall. I understand that a Deputy Chief Commander was appointed to the accident commission. He was also in charge of the traffic control for that region, and he could have been responsible [for events on March 27], but he didn’t pay attention to them in his report. It could have been problematic.’

Leonov was unhappy about such obstruction. He was sure that the supersonic boom had not been a figment of his imagination. Eyewitnesses on the ground, near the crash zone, contributed some powerful supporting evidence, which again was not included in the final report. ‘Apart from the fact that I heard the sounds myself, three local dwellers were questioned separately. All of them said they’d seen smoke and fire coming out of a plane’s tail. Then it went up into the clouds. So it was a reversed process. Gagarin fell down to earth, but this other plane went upwards at great speed.’ The witnesses were shown aircraft identification charts, and all of them immediately picked out the distinctive outline of a new Sukhoi SU-11 supersonic jet, which looked nothing like an old MiG-15. ‘We knew that SU-11s could be in that area, but they were supposed to fly above 10,000 metres,’ says Leonov.

The ‘smoke and fire’ coming from the mysterious plane’s rear end were

Return Main Page Previous Page Next Page

®Online Book Reader