Sun in a Bottle - Charles Seife [117]
154 “These folks need a fair hearing,” Siegel, “America Condemns Inventive Science, Fathers of Cold Fusion Tell ABC,” B1.
154 “a colossal conspiracy of denial.” Platt, “What If Cold Fusion Is Real?”
154 “Cold fusion today is a prime example of pathological science,” Begley, “Cold Fusion Isn’t Dead, It’s Just Withering from Scientific Neglect,” B1.
155 “Valone called for” Voss, “A Free Energy Enthusiast Seeks Like-Minded Colleagues,” 1254.
155 “The speakers list for CoFE” Park, “Free Energy: State Department Opens Its Doors to New Agers.”
156 “In cooperation with the U.S. Department of Commerce” Park, “Future Energy: New Age Energy Conference Moves to Commerce.”
156 “The federal government’s budget pie” “In the Matter of Arbitration Between Patent Office Professional Association and U.S. Department of Commerce, Patent and Trademark Office.”
CHAPTER 7: SECRETS
160 “the breaking of an enemy code” Bylinsky, “Shiva: The Next Step to Fusion Power,” 87.
160 “energy release at the giant $25 million Shiva” Sullivan, “Reports Assay Failures and Hopes for Fusion Power.”
162 80 percent of the capsules failed to ignite, Seife, “Will NIF Live Up to Its Name,” 1128.
164 “the operation of a magnetic fusion demonstration plant” Magnetic Fusion Energy Engineering Act of 1980, §2 (b) 4.
165n “I thought I was going to a wake” Herman, Fusion, 209.
167 Rush Holt Presentation to college group, 5 October 1992.
CHAPTER 8: BUBBLE TROUBLE
170 “Hegel observes somewhere” Marx, The 18th Brumaire of Louis Napoleon, 287.
172 “Here’s a Science paper” Robert Coontz, e-mail to author, 5 February 2002.
176 “Right after you did your story” Rusi Taleyarkhan, e-mail to author, 6 February 2002.
180 “I thought, doggone!” Seife, “‘Bubble Fusion’ Paper Generates Tempest in a Beaker,” 1808.
181 “There was certainly pressure from Oak Ridge” Ibid., 1809.
182 “I understand there has been some discussion” Richard Garwin, e-mail message, 28 February 2002.
182 “I am told that the paper in question,” Will Happer, e-mail message, 1 March 2002.
183 “I like Science; I’m a member of AAAS,” Will Happer, telephone conversation with author, 2002.
183 “It would be unfortunate” Richard Garwin, telephone conversation with author, 2002.
183 “Concern on the part of research managers” Don Kennedy, e-mail message, (forwarded by Happer), 26 February 2002.
184 “I’m confused” Draft of Seife, “ ‘Bubble Fusion’ Paper Generates Tempest in a Beaker,” 4 March 2002.
184 “The paper’s kind of a patchwork” Ibid.
185 “calling around asking about activities” E-mail extract (unidentified) forwarded by Will Happer to author, 1 March 2002.
186 “Be careful what you write” Will Happer, e-mail to author, 1 March 2002.
186 “Taleyarkhan and his team,” Draft of Seife, “ ‘Bubble Fusion’ Generates Tempest in a Beaker,” 4 March 2002.
187 “Bubble Fusion: A Collective Groan” Park, “Bubble Fusion: A Collective Groan Can Be Heard.”
187 “Fusion in a Flash?” American Association for the Advancement of Science, “Fusion in a Flash?”
189 “Preliminary Evidence Suggests” Oak Ridge National Laboratory, “Preliminary Evidence Suggests Possible Nuclear Emissions during Experiments.”
190 “I’m sorry if my cold-fusion allergy” Don Kennedy, e-mail to author, 4 March 2002.
190 “[W]e ask all Science Press Package registrants” American Association for the Advancement of Science, “Special Notice to All Science Press Package Recipients.”
191 “Fusion ‘Breakthrough’ Heralds Cleaner Energy,” Connor, “Fusion ‘Breakthrough’ Heralds Cleaner Energy,” 9.
191 “Here we go again; Table-top fusion” Economist, “Here We Go Again; Table-Top Fusion,” 95.
192 “I reviewed the paper twice,” Vedantam, “Fusion Experiment Sparks an Academic Brawl,” A10.
192 “unready for publication” Putterman, Crum, and Suslick, “Comments on ‘Evidence for Nuclear Emissions During Acoustic Cavitation’; by R. P. Taleyarkhan et al.,