The Black Banners_ 9_11 and the War Against Al-Qaeda - Ali H. Soufan [0]
BLACK BANNERS
* * *
The Inside Story of 9/11 and
the War Against al-Qaeda
ALI H. SOUFAN
with Daniel Freedman
W. W. NORTON & COMPANY
NEW YORK n LONDON
For Heather, Connor, Dean, and Dylan
—my peace of mind
CONTENTS
* * *
IMPORTANT NOTE CONCERNING THE TEXT
MAP
PROLOGUE
NOTE TO READERS
PART 1 · THE EARLY YEARS
1. The Fatwa and the Bet
2. Osama Air
3. The Northern Group
PART 2 · DECLARATION OF WAR
4. The al-Qaeda Switchboard
5. Operation Challenge and the
Manchester Manual
6. “You’ll Be Singing Like a Canary”
7. Millennium Plot
PART 3 · USS COLE
8. A Naval Destroyer in Yemen?
9. The Hall of Death
10. “We’re Stubborn, but We’re Not Crazy”
11. The Human Polygraph Machine
12. “What Is al-Qaeda Doing in Malaysia?”
13. Bin Laden’s Errand Boy
PART 4 · THE ATTACK THAT
CHANGED THE WORLD
14. The Binalshibh Riddle
15. “What Dots?”
16. The Father of Death
PART 5 · A NEW WORLD ORDER
17. Bin Laden’s Escape
18. DocEx
19. Black Magic
PART 6 · THE FIRST HIGH-VALUE DETAINEE
20. Abu Zubaydah
21. The Contractors Take Over
22. “We Don’t Do That”
PART 7 · SUCCESSES AND FAILURES
23. Guantánamo Bay
24. 45 Minutes
25. The Crystal Ball Memo
PART 8 · FINAL MISSIONS
26. Leaving the FBI
27. Undercover
POSTSCRIPT
CONCLUSION
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
PRINCIPAL CHARACTERS
KEY DOCUMENTS AND ARTICLES CITED
IMPORTANT NOTE CONCERNING THE TEXT
* * *
I would like to explain to readers why there are redactions throughout this book.
As a former FBI special agent, I was required by contract to submit my manuscript for review to ensure that it did not reveal classified information. I would have submitted the manuscript for review even if I’d had no legal obligation to do so.
For three months, the FBI conducted its review, and after requesting specific changes, the bureau sent me a letter saying that the manuscript was “approved for publication with respect to FBI information.” In the same letter, the FBI informed me that the manuscript had been sent to the CIA for review. This was strange, as I have never reported to the CIA or had any contractual agreement with them. While I understood that the FBI might feel the need to consult with others in the intelligence community about certain material in the book, there was absolutely no reason to subject me to a second full-blown prepublication review. Nonetheless, I waited, and after a series of delays, I received two separate responses. On August 2, 2011, the CIA sent a list of concerns to the FBI regarding chapters 1–15, and on August 9, the agency sent concerns regarding chapter 16 to the end of the book. At this point I was told that the manuscript was “approved for publication” once the concerns were addressed.
Less than half a day after receiving each list, I sent responses to the FBI, with examples, showing that the material the CIA wanted to redact fell into four categories: it was in the public domain; it was FBI information; it was declassified CIA information; or it did not meet classification guidelines. In the fourth case, these strict guidelines protect the public from the practice of any agency’s illegally classifying information for reasons other than that of national security, such as trying to censor embarrassment or cover up mistakes.
In response, the FBI told me that the CIA “took back” their redactions and that the agency was planning to send an even more extensive set—which they did, on August 16, 2011. These redactions, like the others, violate classification guidelines and range from the ridiculous to the absurd. They include censoring part of a public exchange between a U.S. senator and myself that was broadcast live on national television.
Because I committed to publishing the book on September 12, 2011, I reluctantly offer it with all of the CIA’s redactions. The power of the tale is such that any effort to rob it of its meaning could hardly be effective, and I trust that despite the black lines blocking portions of the