The Deerslayer (Barnes & Noble Classics) - James Fenimore Cooper [326]
which mark his riper years. The old buccaneer in his aquatic
habitation, and the contrasted characters of his two daughters, add a
human interest to the scene, for the want of which the highest skill in
mere landscape painting cannot compensate. The character of Judith
seems to us the best drawn, and by far the most interesting, female
portrait in any of Cooper’s novels with which we are acquainted. The
story, however, is not free from the characteristic faults of its author.
Above all, it contains, in one instance at least, a glaring exhibition of
his aptitude for describing horrors. When he compels his marvellously
graphic pen to depict scenes which would disgrace the shambles or
the dissecting table, none can wonder that ladies and young clergymen
regard his pages with abhorrence. These, however, are but casual
defects in a work which bears the unmistakable impress of his genius.
—from North American Review (January 1852)
JOSEPH CONRAD
[James Fenimore Cooper] wrote before the great American language
was born, and he wrote as well as any novelist of his time. If he pitches
upon episodes redounding to the glory of the young republic, surely
England has glory enough to forgive him, for the sake of his excellence,
the patriotic bias at her expense. The interest of his tales is convincing
and unflagging; and there runs through his work a steady vein
of friendliness for the old country which the succeeding generations
of his compatriots have replaced by a less definite sentiment.
-from Outlook (June 4, 1898)
HONORÉ DE BALZAC
Cooper is in our epoch the only author worthy of being put aside
Walter Scott: he does not equal him, but he has his genius. He owes
the high place he holds in modern literature to two faculties: that of
painting the sea and seamen; that of idealizing the magnificent landscapes
of America.... I feel for his two faculties the admiration Walter
Scott felt for them, which is still further deserved by the grandeur,
the originality of Leather-Stocking, that fine personality which binds
into one The Pioneers, The Mohicans, The Pathfinder and The Prairie. LeatherStocking
is a statue, a magnificent moral hermaphrodite, born of the
savage state and of civilization, who will live as long as literatures last.
I do not know that the extraordinary work of Walter Scott furnishes
a creation as grandiose as that of this hero of the savannas and the
forests. Gurth in Ivanhoe approaches Leather-Stocking. We feel that if
the great Scotchman had seen America he might have created LeatherStocking
. It is, especially, by that man, half Indian, half civilized, that
Cooper has risen to the level of Walter Scott.
—translated by K. P Wormeley,
from The Personal Opinions of Honore de Balzac ( 1899)
D. H. LAWRENCE
Natty was Fenimore’s great Wish: his wish-fulfilment.... Because it
seems to me that the things in Cooper that make one so savage, when
one compares them with actuality, are perhaps, when one considers
them as presentations of a deep subjective desire, real in their way,
and almost prophetic.
-from Studies in Classic American Literature ( 19 2 3 )
CARL VAN DOREN
[The Deerslayer] is the tale of Natty’s coming of age. Already a hunter,
he here kills his first man and thus enters the long career which lies
before him. That career, however, had already been traced by Cooper,
and the distress with which Deerslayer realizes that he has human
blood on his hands, becomes, in the light of his future, immensely
eloquent. It gives the figure of the man almost a new dimension; one
remembers the deaths Natty has yet to deal. In other matters he is
nearer his later self, for he starts life with a steady if simple philosophy
which, through all his many adventures, keeps him to the end
the son of nature he was at the beginning.
-from The American Novel, 1789-1939 ( 1940)
Questions
1. Who is right about “Fenimore Cooper’s Literary Offenses,” Mark Twain or Bruce L. R. Smith, the author of this edition’s introduction?
2. Consider Deerslayer’s