The Legend of Zelda and Philosophy_ I Link Therefore I Am - Luke Cuddy [92]
There are some particular strategies to be fulfilled to go forward in the game: Link has to find secret doors and objects in dungeons (characterizing all the installments of Zelda from the very beginning), or he has to talk to someone (or rather, listen) to allow particular events in the game to occur. In Semiotics there is a concept called Model Player, and what we have called until now Link’s player is pretty much The Legend of Zelda’s Model Player.
So Link’s life, within the game, is fated, already chosen; in many episodes he has to find the Master Sword before he can save Zelda. To become Link’s player requires the gamer to feel these limitations and follow Link’s destiny. But the gamer must also feel will to give energy to this destiny. Zelda has always been an adventure game where the gamer has to discover things for herself and get into the game’s story. There is a high involvement in completing Link’s fate because the player has the sensation of ‘being there’, of being himself part of Hyrule. His decisions are effective there. This parallelism of determined life and free will is what was taught by Schopenhauer.
The adventure of Link and the Princess Zelda within Hyrule has been decided long ago, once and forever, and repeats itself at every game. But at every game Link’s acts get repeated in a time that for the player outside Hyrule is always a now. Link’s inner voice, at the same time inside him and outside Hyrule, speaks in a time that is present both to Link and to the player. The real person becoming Link’s player lives in Hyrule for a while. What permits this connection is the transcendental: having consciousness in Hyrule and will on Earth.
So, you see, Schopenhauer and Zelda do have something in common! How have you played until now without knowing Schopenhauer?
15
Zeldathustra
MICHAEL BRUCE
It’s been over twenty years since Zelda was first introduced to the world. Yet every time you insert that original gold cartridge into the console and hear the enchanting music—after blowing on it and meticulously adjusting it, of course—it takes you back. You as the player have changed, but the game itself, the original adventure, is always the same.
One of the novelties of the old-school, original Zelda is that, unlike other games of the time like Super Mario Brothers, it does not utilize a game clock. There’s no rush till the end, no desperate leaps or infuriating buzzers. Furthermore, while there is a distinct plot and direction to the game, Link has the ability to move in multiple directions, progressing in a fashion that could be called “out of order.” In contrast to side-scrollers (games played from left to right), Zelda has a top down perspective which enables Link to navigate the terrain in a more adventurous way. (Adventure of Link has side-scroller dungeons and caves, but it, too, makes use of a top down perspective in the overworld.)
One of the effects of not having a nerve-wracking game clock is that you’re able to explore Link’s world, experiment with weapons and items, and, generally, play the game in a different way than you would if you did have a clock. With the freedom of unlimited time and the ability to restart the game, you as the player can make Link act in various ways—hero, villain, test dummy. In the absence of a game clock, the only time constraint is the one projected onto the game by you, the player. While you may have to break for dinner or homework, Link could journey forever. The ability to save your progress is a remarkable and necessary feature of the game; Hyrule is a vast wild space and this watershed technology enabled the player to project more meaning and value onto Link. When