Online Book Reader

Home Category

The Mammoth Book of New Sherlock Holmes Adventures - Mike Ashley [1]

By Root 437 0
Substitution Scandal

DAVID STUART DAVIES

The Adventure of the Suspect Servant

BARBARA RODEN

The Adventure of the Amateur Mendicant Society

JOHN GREGORY BETANCOURT

The Adventure of the Silver Buckle

DENIS O. SMITH

The Case of the Sporting Squire

GUY N. SMITH

The Vanishing of the Atkinsons

ERIC BROWN

The Adventure of the Fallen Star

SIMON CLARK

PART III: THE 1890s

The Adventure of the Dorset Street Lodger

MICHAEL MOORCOCK

The Mystery of the Addleton Curse

BARRIE ROBERTS

The Adventure of the Parisian Gentleman

ROBERT WEINBERG & LOIS H. GRESH

The Adventure of the Inertial Adjustor

STEPHEN BAXTER

The Adventure of the Touch of God

PETER CROWTHER

The Adventure of the Persecuted Painter

BASIL COPPER

The Adventure of the Suffering Ruler

H. R. F. KEATING

The Repulsive Story of the Red Leech

DAVID LANGFORD

The Adventure of the Grace Chalice

ROGER JOHNSON

The Adventure of the Faithful Retainer

AMY MYERS

PART IV: THE FINAL YEARS

The Case of the Suicidal Lawyer

MARTIN EDWARDS

The Legacy of Rachel Howells

MICHAEL DOYLE

The Adventure of the Bulgarian Diplomat

ZAKARIA ERZINÇLIOGLU

The Enigma of the Warwickshire Vortex

F. GWYNPLAINE MacINTYRE

The Case of the Last Battle

L. B. GREENWOOD

Appendix I: A Complete Chronology of Sherlock Holmes’s cases

Appendix II: The Tales of Sherlock Holmes

The Contributors

Foreword

Richard Lancelyn Green

One of the most famous opening paragraphs in a Sherlock Holmes story is that found in “Thor Bridge” (which was first published in the 1920s). Dr Watson says: “Somewhere in the vaults of the bank of Cox & Co., at Charing Cross, there is a travel-worn and battered tin dispatch-box with my name, John H. Watson, M.D., Late Indian Army, painted upon the lid. It is crammed with papers, nearly all of which are records of cases to illustrate the curious problems which Mr Sherlock Holmes had at various times to examine.” Readers had already been offered tantalizing details of many unrecorded cases in preceding stories, but this confirmed that he had a “long row of year-books which fill a shelf, and there are the dispatch cases filled with documents”. He rightly called it “a perfect quarry for the student, not only of crime, but of the social and official scandals of the late Victorian era”. It is into these that the authors represented in the present volume have dipped.

The influence of Sherlock Holmes made itself felt within months of the publication of the first short stories in the Strand Magazine. There was plagiarism which achieved its apogee with Sexton Blake who had rooms in Baker Street, and there were rivals who knew they could succeed only by being different. The “Golden Age” of detective fiction was littered with a strange array of private inquiry agents who were fat, blind, Belgian or of the opposite sex. Yet for all their attempts at being different, they never entirely escaped the shadow of Sherlock Holmes. As Scotland Yard had discovered, his longest shots invariably hit their mark, and even when he was outwitted, as he was by Irene Adler, his reputation was enhanced.

It is the art of a great writer to leave the reader anxious for more, and Dr Watson was such a writer. He often erred on the side of discretion, and he intrigued the reader because of his less than perfect grasp of detail. Where his knowledge failed he resorted to imagination and was not unduly concerned when this led to contradictions and inconsistencies within the text. He introduced colour and variety and irrelevance, which added to the myth and gave the reader a picture which was sharp in its essentials, but blurred at the edges.

No reader has ever put down the stories believing that Watson had said the last word on the subject. For some there was an irresistible urge to parody the style and to play with the name of Sherlock Holmes (which lends itself well to mutations such as Shylock Bones, Sherluck Gnomes, Picklock Holes, or Sheerlecoq Omes). The parodies made fun of the contrasting characteristics of Holmes and Watson, between the infallible brain which could distinguish

Return Main Page Previous Page Next Page

®Online Book Reader