The royals - Kitty Kelley [0]
KITTY KELLEY
NEW YORK BOSTON
To my husband John, who makes dreams come true.
“… Once in a while a family has to surrender itself to an outsider’s account. A family can get buried in its own fairy dust, and this leads straight, in my opinion, to the unpacking of lies and fictions from its piddly shared scraps of inbred history….”
From The Stone Diaries
by Carol Shields
“I believe in aristocracy though, if that is the right word and if a democrat may use it. Not an aristocracy of power based upon rank and influence, but an aristocracy of the sensitive, the considerate and the plucky. Its members are to be found in all nations and classes and all through the ages and there is a secret understanding between them when they meet. They represent the true human tradition, the one permanent victory of our queer race over cruelty and chaos.”
From a 1941 essay by
E. M. Forster
Author’s Note
February 13, 1997
If a cat may look on a king, as the English proverb goes, so can a Kitty. The ancient king had been succeeded by a modern queen by the time I started to take my look. So I wrote to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II as a matter of courtesy and said I was researching a book on the House of Windsor. I respectfully requested an interview, but her press secretary replied that the Queen does not grant interviews.
“Our policy,” Charles Anson wrote on Buckingham Palace stationery, “is to try to help bona fide authors writing serious books on the Monarchy and the Royal Family with factual information on matters of public interest. I shall, therefore, be happy to do this for you if you can first give me some indication of the theme of your book and the specific areas in which you would like to put questions to me.”
He asked me to submit an outline. “Naturally, I would treat this in complete confidence,” he wrote. This puzzled me. Did he mean that he wouldn’t show the outline to anyone, including the Queen and the rest of the royal family? Or was he going to keep it from the British press, which had been reporting (incorrectly) that I was writing a biography of the Queen’s husband, Philip, the Duke of Edinburgh?
Already the Duke was getting agitated about the prospect of someone writing a book about him that he had not authorized. In 1994, according to British reporters traveling with him, he threatened to sue me. While visiting New York, he was asked about “the book that Kitty Kelley is writing,” and he was quoted as saying, “I will protect my good name.” His pronouncement caused a stir in the British press. “Never before has a member of the royal family personally issued such a blunt warning,” wrote Chris Hutchins in Today. “Prince Philip says he is prepared to sue and Buckingham Palace lawyers are already ‘on full alert.’ ” The Daily Star reported the exchange as “Prince’s Threat over Kitty Shocker: I Will Sue If Your Book’s Too Saucy.”
The stories prompted numerous calls to my office in Washington, D.C., from men and women claiming to be the illegitimate offspring of royalty. From Argentina, Australia, England, Wales, and New York, people called to tell me of their royal parentage. They volunteered to send photos of themselves, extracts from family diaries, and letters from distant relatives to substantiate their claim, but none produced a birth certificate. Yet even without authentic documentation, they remained convinced that they had been sired outside of marriage by a member of the British royal family.
When I wrote back to the Queen’s press secretary, I told him that I wanted to interview as many people as possible who could speak with authority on the House of Windsor. As an American writing for an international audience, I asked the Queen’s press secretary to help me develop an accurate record on a subject of intense public interest. Many books have been written about the Windsors, but most contradict one another. Eminent historians differ on basic details. Few agree on anything except how the family spells its name.
Since I was still in the process of acquiring information, I explained