The Sweet Science - A. J. Liebling [1]
To most contemporary Americans the customs and traditions of fighters appear as bizarre and savage as those of Kandangai headhunters. In the 1950s, however, boxing was much closer to the general public. This familiarity, and Liebling’s own boxing experience, allowed him to represent the sport as sport. His stance toward its sometimes disturbing violence might seem blase to us—as when he describes Ezra Charles’s disfigurement at the hands of Rocky Marciano—but Liebling saw boxing as the pros do: a job, more difficult than most but also more rewarding. He doesn’t make the ring over into the setting for a morality play or an alternate site for Armageddon (he had witnessed the real thing on the battlefields of Europe).
This is not to say that Liebling didn’t take boxing seriously. As far as he was concerned, boxing deserved to be called “science.” He understood the intellectual and physical effort necessary to master the craft. Although he recognized the brute force of a Marciano, he preferred technicians to sluggers—a suitable predilection for one of the great stylists of his generation. Hence his disapproval of Ingemar Johansson’s lax training methods and his appreciation of the shrewd old artist Archie Moore, whom he called “a boxer’s boxer, as Stendhal was for a long time a writer’s writer.” Liebling rarely covered unproven fighters, but his eye for talent was acute enough to recognize, in late 1961, the aura around a brash young heavyweight named Cassius Clay (he also enjoyed Clay’s verbal prowess).
Liebling knew he was covering a sport in decline. He had watched boxing descend from a pinnacle in the 1920s, when it rivaled baseball as a national pastime and Jack Dempsey garnered more headlines than Babe Ruth. Even during the Depression-era doldrums of 1938, New York City counted more than a thousand registered professional boxers who performed weekly at seven city clubs, while amateurs fought as often as every other day for prizes that could easily be pawned (a useful quality in the twentieth century’s worst economic crisis). When Liebling returned to the beat fourteen years later, New York had only 241 pros; all but one of the clubs had shut down, and the old Madison Square Garden, world capital of boxing, was a ghost kingdom with spectral tiers of empty seats.
Liebling’s prose is shaded by the recognition that his time is passing. Time hangs over all of us, but it strikes no one more swiftly than boxers, who can become old men in three minutes. Even the great champions, men who have defeated every other opponent, are helpless against this threat. The Sweet Science opens with the last stand of Joe Louis, hero of Liebling’s young manhood, and closes with a thirty-nine-year-old (at least) Archie Moore succumbing to Marciano. The succession