Theory of Constraints Handbook - James Cox Iii [390]
The Role of the LTP in the CMM
How does the LTP fit in with the CMM? The preceding description of the CMM fairly begs for a structured tool to make Steps 1 through 5 happen. That tool is the LTP. Figure 19-10 shows how the LTP energizes the CMM.
The IO Map is used to establish the benchmark of expected or desired performance. For an organization that already understands that it’s not yet where it wants to be, the articulation of the goal and CSFs in the IO establish a “stake in the ground”—the destination marker that determines where the organization wants to be at the end of the strategy’s time horizon. Supporting necessary conditions represent the high-level functional milestones that must be achieved to reach the goal. Inherent in the development of the IO Map are research, observations, and information gathered about the external environment.
With the IO Map as the entering argument (desirable state), a CRT10 is constructed to depict the relationship between reality and the end results depicted in the IO Map. The resulting gaps are reflected as undesirable effects (UDEs). The construction of the body of the tree, down to the critical root causes, embodies the synthesis (or orientation) of newly acquired knowledge about the external environment with experience, expertise, custom, tradition, etc.—the existing paradigm, if you will. The CRT produces the logical causes of the gaps (UDEs), without regard to whether they are politically acceptable to consider changing.
Especially in the latter situation, the transformation created in Step 3 is facilitated by the use of Evaporating Clouds (ECs), which are specifically designed to resolve intractable dilemmas such as political feasibility. The output of the ECs, and the beginning of this transformation process, is one or more injections that represent breakthrough ideas. These ideas become initiatives, or new projects that will provide the impetus to move the organization from where it is to where it wants to be. Some of these initiatives (changes) will undoubtedly be externally focused. Others will be inwardly directed.
The Future Reality Tree (FRT) takes these initiatives, or ideas, and logically structures them to verify that, in fact, they will move the organization toward its ultimate goal. The reflection of that movement is in the narrowing, or complete closure, of the gaps identified in Step 2. This narrowing/closure is represented as a desired effect (DE) in the FRT. Besides logically verifying that the initiatives created will, in fact, advance the organization toward its ultimate goal, the FRT will include the “ferreting