Piracy_ The Intellectual Property Wars from Gutenberg to Gates - Adrian Johns [310]
16 The standard discussion of this topic is M. Woodmansee, "Genius and the Copyright," in her TheAuthor, Art, and the Market: Rereading the History ofAesthetics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1994), 35-55. Woodmansee is currently writing a book that will give the definitive account of these debates. In the meantime, see also A. Johns, "The Piratical Enlightenment," in This Is Enlightenment, ed. C. Siskin and W. Warner (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, forthcoming). The best brief introduction to Naturphilosophie in English is N. Jardine, "Naturphilosophie and the Kingdoms of Nature," in Cultures ofNaturalHistory, ed. N, Jardine, J. A. Secord, and E. C. Spary (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), 230-45. The best introduction to book piracy in Germany in this period is Reinhard Wittmann, "Highwaymen or Heroes of Enlightenment? Viennese and South German Pirates and the German Market" (paper presented at the conference "The History of Books and Intellectual History," Princeton University, 2004), available at www.princeton.edu/ csb/conferences/december-2004/papers/Wittman-Paper.doc.
17 J. Schmidt, ed., What Is Enlightenment?Eighteenth-Century Answer and Twentieth-Century Questions (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996).
18 I. Kant, "On the wrongfulness of unauthorized publication of books," in his PracticalPhilosopby, ed. M.J. Gregor and A. Wood (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), 23-35. E. [sic] Kant, Essays and treatises on moral, political, and variousphilosophical subjects, trans. J. Richardson, 2 vols. (London [Altenburg?]: for the translator, 1798), 1:225-39. Kant later reiterated the argument in his "Metaphysics of Morals," in Practical Philosophy, 437-38.
4 EXPERIMENTING WITH PRINT
I A. Cowley, "To the Royal Society," in T. Sprat, The History of the Royal Society ofLondon (London: J. Martyn and J. Allestrey 1667), sig. B2r.
2 See, for example, N. Jardine, The Birth of History and Philosophy of Science: Keplers A Defence of Tycho against Ur sus" with Essays on Its Provenance and Significance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984), and P. Dear, Discipline and Experience: The Mathematical Way in the Scientific Revolution (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995), 93-123.
3 S. Shapin and S.J. Schaffer, Leviathan and theAir-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life (Princeton, N .J.: Princeton University Press, 1985), 22-79-
4 A. Blair, "Reading Strategies for Coping with Information Overload, ca. 1550-1700," Journal of the History of Ideas 64 (2003):11-28.
5 R. Hooke, The Posthumous Works of Robert Hooke, ed. R. Waller (London: S. Smith and B. Walford,1705), 18-19,24,34-36, 63-65,139-40; L. Mulligan, "Robert Hooke's `Memoranda': Memory and Natural History," Annals ofScience 49 (1992): 47-61, esp. 50-53.
6 There is now an extensive literature on this subject, but see especially S. Shapin, A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in SeventeenthCentury England (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994); S. Shapin, "The House of Experiment in Seventeenth-Century England," Isis 79 (1988): 373-404; M. Biagioli, "Etiquette, Interdependence, and Sociability in Seventeenth-Century Science," Critical Inquiry 22 (1996):193-238; M. Biagioli, "Knowledge, Freedom and Brotherly Love: Homosociability and the Accademia dei Lincei," Configurations 3 (1995):139-66; M. Biagioli, Galileo, Courtier: The Practice of Science in the Culture ofAbsolutism (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993).
7 Compare the remarks in D. F. McKenzie, "Speech-Manuscript-Print," in New Directions in Textual ,Studies, ed. D. Oliphant and R. Bradford (Austin, Tex.: Harry Ransom Humanities Research Center, iggo), 87-log, and R. Chartier "Leisure and Sociability: ReadingAloud in Early Modern Europe," trans. C. Mossman, in Urban Life in the Renaissance, ed. S. Zimmerman and R. F. E. Wiessman (London and Toronto: Associated University Presses, r989), 103-20.
8 E.g., H. Longino, Science as Social Knowledge (Princeton, NJ.: Princeton University Press, 199o), 62-132; L.