• Choose a category
• All
• Classic-Fiction

29 P. H. Nicklin, Remarks on Literary Property (Philadelphia: P. H. Nicklin and T. Johnson, 1838). For Carey's concurrence, see, e.g., H. C. Carey, Letters on International Copyright (Philadelphia: A. Hart, 1853), 58-59.

3o Nicklin, Remarks, 24-25, 33, 50, 58-63, 83; cf J. Sklansky, The Soul's Economy: Market Society and Se fhood inAmerican Thought, 1820-1920 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2002), 8o.

3r HSP, Lea and Febiger Papers, 1821; University of Michigan, Clements Library, Henry Carey Letterbook, p. 5; W. Elder, A Memoir ofHenry C. Carey (Philadelphia: Henry Carey Baird & Co., 188o), 24; J. L. Huston, The Panic of 1859 and the Coming of the Civil War (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1987), 134-35; K. Marx, Grundrisse, trans. M. Nicolaus (London: Penguin, 1993 [19731), 754, 883-93. W. E. Gienapp, The Origins of the Republican Party, 1852-1856 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1987), 397, 403; Huston, Panic of1857, 241-42, 249-50. For Carey's position with respect to early sociology, see Sklansky, Soul's Economy, 171-204. Smith's correspondence with Carey is in the HSP: see, e.g., Smith to Carey, October 31, 1869, HSP, Carey Section (CS), ECG, H. C. Carey Papers (HCC), Box 78, folder 4; April 14,185o, January 15, 1854, February 22, 1854, March 2, 1854, March 4, 1854, and February 22, 1855, Box 77, folder 16.

32 Carey, Letters on International Copyright (1853), 58.

33 E. P. Smith to Carey, January 22, 1854, February 22, 1854, HSP CS, HCC Papers, Box 77, folder i9; H. C. Carey, The Unity ofLaw; As Exhibited in the Relations of Physical, Social, Mental, and MoralScience (Philadelphia: H. C. Baird, 1872), 16-17,71-75; K. McKean, Manual ofSocial Science (Philadelphia: H. C. Baird, 1864), title page, iv -v.

34 H. C. Carey, Essay on the Rate of Wages (Philadelphia: Carey, Lea and Blanchard, 1835), esp. 232-45; Carey, Unity ofLaw, 16-17; Sklansky, ,Soul's Economy, 83-85; McKean, Manual ofSocial Science, ix; Elder, Memoir of Henry C. Carey, 15; Carey, Unity ofLaw, x-xi, 382-92. For Ricardo's theory, see D. Ricardo, On the Principles ofPolitical Economy, 3rd ed. (London: John Murray 1821), ch. 2.

35 Carey, Principles ofSocialScience, 1:41-43; Carey, Unity ofLaw, 80-82.

36 H. C. Carey, Review of the Decade, 1857-1867 (Philadelphia: Collins, 1867), 5; Carey, Unity ofLaw, v-x, xi. In general, see C. Smith, The Science ofEnergy: A Cultural History ofEnergy Physics in Victorian Britain (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998).

37 H.C.Carey, Contraction or Expansion? Repudiation or Resumption? Letters to the Hon. Hugh M'Culloch, Secretary to the Treasury (Philadelphia: H. C. Baird, 1866), 20-25, esp. 21; A. Desmond, Huxley: The Devil's Disciple (London: MichaelJoseph,1994),192-93. For electro-biology, see also I. Morus, Frankenstein's Children: Electricity, Exhibition and Experiment in Early Nineteenth-Century London (Princeton, N .J.: Princeton University Press, 1998),147-52. See also M. Schabas, The Natural Origins of Economics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005), 70-74, and M. Poovey, Genres of the Credit Economy. Mediating Value in Eighteenth- and NineteenthCentury Britain (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008).

38 Carey, Unity of Law, 2o6; Carey, Principles of SocialScience, 2:175; T. A. Freyer, Producers versus Capitalists: Constitutional Conflict in Antebellum America (Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1994), 3, 7-8, 49-51; Sklansky, Soul's Economy, 88, 9o; E. P. Thompson, "The Moral Economy of the English Crowd in the Eighteenth Century, " in Thompson, Customs in Common (New York: New Press, 1993), 185-258, e.g.,193, 205-6.

39 Carey, Unity ofLaw, 190-91, 219-23.

40 H. C. Carey, The Prospect (Philadelphia: J. S. Skinner, 185r), 13; H. C. Carey, Commerce, Christianity, and Civilization, versus British. Free Trade (Philadelphia: Collins, 1876),5,36; Carey, Unity ofLaw,198-99; H. C. Carey, The Way to Outdo England without Fighting Her (Philadelphia: H. C. Baird, 1865),7-8,31-32.

41 Carey,