Safe Food_ Bacteria, Biotechnology, and Bioterrorism - Marion Nestle [197]
4. Hoban TJ. Consumer acceptance of biotechnology: an international perspective. Nature Biotechnology 1997;15:232–234. Aerni P. Public attitudes towards agricultural biotechnology in developing countries: a comparison between Mexico and the Philippines. Cambridge, MA: Center for International Development, Harvard University, October 1, 2001, at www.inai.org.ar/ogm/Public%20Attitudes%20towards%20Agricultural%20Biotechnology%20in%20developing%20countires.pdf.
5. Barling D, de Vriend H, Cornelese JA, et al. The social aspects of food biotechnology: a European view. Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology 1999;7:85–93. Frewer L. Public perceptions of genetically modified foods in Europe. J Commercial Biotechnology 1999;6:108–115. Thompson PB. Food Biotechnology in Ethical Perspective. London: Blackie Academic & Professional, 1997.
6. HRH, the Prince of Wales. Seeds of disaster. Daily Telegraph (London), June 8, 1998. Reprinted in Ecologist 1998;28(5):252–253.
7. Smith G, Gruner P. “Scaremonger” but Charles is right to call for debate. Evening Standard (London), June 8, 1998:4.
8. Thavis J. Vatican experts OK plant, animal genetic engineering. St. Louis Review, October 22, 1999:E1. Lyman E. Pope expresses opposition to GMOs: cites need for “the respect of nature.” Bureau of National Affairs, No. 221, November 15, 2000, at http://online.sfsu.edu/~rone/GEessays/PopeGMO.htm.
9. Genetically modified food: food for thought. Economist, June 19, 1999: 19–21.
10. Frederickson DS. The Recombinant DNA Controversy: A Memoir: Science, Politics, and the Public Interest 1974–1981. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology, 2001. For another view, see: Krimsky S. Genetic Alchemy: The Social History of the Recombinant DNA Controversy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1994.
11. Commoner B. Unraveling the DNA myth: the spurious foundation of genetic engineering. Harper’s, February 2002:39–47.
12. Fuchs RL, Astwood JD. Allergenicity assessment of foods derived from genetically modified plants. Food Technology 1996;50(2):83–88. Metcalfe DD, Fuchs RL, Townsend R, et al., eds. Allergenicity of foods produced by genetic modification. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 1996;36(suppl): S1–S186.
13. Consumer & Biotechnology Foundation. Genetically Modified Foods and Allergenicity: Safety Aspects and Consumer Information (workshop proceedings), May 28–29, 1999. Den Haag. The Netherlands: Stichting Consument en Biotechnologie, 1999.
14. Buchanan BB. Genetic engineering and the allergy issue. Plant Physiology 2001;126:5–7.
15. Burks AW, Fuchs RL. Assessment of the endogenous allergens in glyphosate-tolerant and commercial soybean varieties. J Allergy and Clinical Immunology 1995;96:1008–1110.
16. Winslow R. Allergen is inadvertently transferred to soybean in bioengineering test. WSJ, March 14, 1996:B6.
17. Nordlee JA, Taylor SL, Townsend JA, et al. Identification of a Brazil-nut allergen in transgenic soybeans. NEJM 1996;334:688–692.
18. FDA. Statement of policy: foods derived from new plant varieties. FR 57:22984–22986, May 29, 1992.
19. FDA. Food labeling: food derived from new plant varieties. FR 58:25837–25841, April 28, 1993. BIO favors limited notification on biotech food 3-year sunset. FCN, May 16, 1994:7–8.
20. EPA. FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel Meeting, November 28, 2000 (SAP Report No. 2000-06), December 1, 2000. EPA Scientific Advisory Panel (SAP) reports are online at: www.epa.gov/scipoly/sap [Note: search by date].
21. Nestor EW, Roberts CE, Pearsall NN, et al. Microbiology: A Human Perspective. 2nd ed. Boston: WCB/McGraw-Hill, 1998.
22. Holmberg SD, Osterholm MT, Senger KA, et al. Drug-resistant Salmonella from animals fed antimicrobials.