Safe Food_ Bacteria, Biotechnology, and Bioterrorism - Marion Nestle [199]
36. Monsanto. Responses to questions raised and statements made by environmental/consumer groups and other critics of biotechnology and Roundup Ready soybeans, April 21, 1997, at http://db.zs-intern.de/uploads/1190982382-monsantoGlyphosateResistantWeeds1997.pdf.
37. Paoletti MG, Pimentel D. Environmental risks of pesticides versus genetic engineering for agricultural pest control. J Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 2000;12:279–303.
38. Cox C. Glyphosate: Part 1: toxicology. Part 2: human exposure and ecological effects. J Pesticide Reform 1995;15(3):14–21 and 1995;15(4):14–20.
39. Coghlan A. Splitting headache: Monsanto’s modified soya beans are cracking up in the heat. New Scientist, November 20, 1999:25.
40. CDC. Eosinophilia-myalgia syndrome—New Mexico. JAMA 1989; 262:3116. Mayeno AN, Gleich GJ. Eosinophilia-myalgia syndrome and tryptophan production: a cautionary tale. Trends in Biotechnology 1994;12:346–352. Philin RM, Hill RH, Flanders WD, et al. Tryptophan contaminants associated with eosinophilia-myalgia syndrome. Am J Epidemiology 1993;138:154–159.
41. Kilbourne EM, Philen RM, Kamb ML, et al. Tryptophan produced by Showa Denko and epidemic eosinophilia-myalgia syndrome. J Rheumatology 1996;23(suppl 46):81–88. Also see: Sternberg EM. Intimidation of researchers by special-interest groups (letter). NEJM 1997;337:1316. In response, the editor of J Rheumatology, D.A. Gordon, said that the Showa Denko–sponsored “reports and our editorial process qualify as unbiased peer review” (1316–1317).
42. Pusztai A. Report of the Project Coordinator on Data Produced at the Rowett Research Institute, SOAEFD (Scottish Office, Agriculture Environment & Fisheries Department) Flexible Fund Project RO 818, October 22, 1998, at www.rowett.ac.uk/gmo.
43. Enserink M. Institute copes with genetic hot potato. Science 1998;281: 1124–1125. Biotech: the pendulum swings back. Rachel’s Environment & Health Weekly, May 16, 1999. Health risks of genetically modified foods (letters). Lancet 1999;353:1811.
44. Berger A. Hot potato. British Medical J 1999;318:611.
45. Bourne FJ, Chesson A, Davies H, et al. Audit of Data Produced at the Rowett Research Institute, SOAEFD (Scottish Office, Agriculture Environment & Fisheries Department) Flexible Fund Project RO 818, August 21, 1998, at www.rowett.ac.uk/gmoarchive/gmaudit.pdf. Enserink M. Preliminary data touch off genetic food fight. Science 1999;283:1094–1095. Christie B. Scientists call for moratorium on genetically modified foods. British Medical J 1999;318:483.
46. Coghlan A, Concar D, MacKenzie D. Frankenfears. New Scientist, February 20, 1999:4.
47. Ewen WB, Pusztai A. Health risks of genetically modified foods (letter). Lancet 1999;354:684.
48. The Royal Society. Review of Data on Possible Toxicity of GM Potatoes, May 18, 1999, at http://royalsociety.org/displaypagedoc.asp?id=6170. Hoge W. Britons skirmish over genetically modified crops. NYT, August 23, 1999:A3. Ellison S. U.K. study dismisses research faulting genetically altered food. WSJ, May 19, 1999:A19.
49. Ewen SWB, Pusztai A. Effect of diets containing genetically modified potatoes expressing Galanthus nivalis lectin on rat small intestine. Lancet 1999;354:1353–1354. Fenton B, Stanley K, Fenton S, et al. Differential binding of the insecticidal lectin GNA to human blood cells. Lancet 1999;354:1354–1355. Kuiper HA, Noteborn HPJM, Peijnenburg AACM. Adequacy of methods for testing the safety of genetically modified foods. Lancet 1999;354:1315–1316.
50. Horton R. Genetically modified foods: “absurd” concern or welcome dialogue? Lancet 1999;354:1314–1315.
51. Flynn L, Gillard MS. Pro-GM food scientist “threatened editor.” Guardian (London), November 1, 1999, at www.guardian.co.uk/science/1999/nov/01/gm.food. See: Correspondence: GM food debate. Lancet 1999;354:1725–1729. En-serink M. The Lancet scolded over Pusztai paper. Science 1999;286:656.
52. Losey JE, Rayor LS, Carter ME. Transgenic pollen harms monarch larvae. Nature 1999;399:214.
53. Stix G. The butterfly effect: new research findings