Safe Food_ Bacteria, Biotechnology, and Bioterrorism - Marion Nestle [204]
2. Poll Shows Broad but Limited Support for Labeling of Bioengineered Foods (press release). CSPI, May 16, 2001, at www.cspinet.org/new/labeling_gefoods.html.
3. International Food Information Council. Most Americans can articulate expected benefits of biotechnology, November 2001, at www.biotech-info.net/IFIC_research.html.
4. Fox JL. U.S. food labeling policy softens. Nature Biotechnology 1999;17:847. Silva C, Leonard R. U.S. prepares to OK labels on GE foods. Nutrition Week, October 29, 1999:4–5.
5. Genetically Engineered Food Right to Know Act. H.R. 3377, 106th Congress, 1st Session, November 16, 1999.
6. Biotech foods bill would mandate labeling, impose civil penalties. Food Regulation Weekly, November 15, 1999:11–12.
7. FDA. Biotechnology in the year 2000 and beyond; public meetings: notice. FR 64:57470–57472, October 25, 1999.
8. FDA. Report on Consumer Focus Groups on Biotechnology, February 2001, at www.foodsafety.gov/~comm/biorpt.html. The FDA conducted 12 focus groups from May 10 to 24, 2000.
9. FDA. FDA to Strengthen Pre-market Review of Bioengineered Foods (press release). May 3, 2000. White House Briefing Room. Clinton Administration Agencies Announce Food and Agricultural Biotechnology Initiatives (press release). May 3, 2000.
10. Pollack A. F.D.A. plans new scrutiny in areas of biotechnology. NYT, January 18, 2001:A12. FDA. Premarket notice concerning bioengineered foods: proposed rule. FR 66:4706–4738, January 18, 2001.
11. Kilman S. FDA warns of misleading label on genetically modified foods. WSJ, December 20, 2001:B9. Weise E. FDA tries to remove genetic label before it sticks. USA Today, October 9, 2002:7D.
12. Nestle M. Food biotechnology: truth in advertising. Bio/Technology 1992;10:1056.
13. OTA. New Developments in Biotechnology: Patenting Life (OTA-BA-370). U.S. Congress, 1989.
14. Stone R. Sweeping patents put biotech companies on the warpath. Science 1995;268:656–658. Rural Advancement Foundation International. Monsanto’s “Submarine Patent” Torpedoes Ag Biotech (press release), April 27, 2001, at www.etcgroup.org/en/materials/publications.html?pub_id=262.
15. Moon SE. Seed piracy: biotech industry faces a growing concern. Illinois Agrinews, April 17, 1998:A9.
16. Kilman S. Biotech industry shivers at threat to seed patents. WSJ, March 3, 1999:B1. Pioneer Hi-Bred International v. J.E.M. Ag Supply (Farm Advantage). 99-1035 (U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit), January 19, 2000. The U.S. Supreme Court confirmed the ruling, December 10, 2001 (534 U.S. 124).
17. Fulmer M. Patent ruling aids seed biotech firms; Courts: analysts say the Supreme Court is taking a tough stance to strengthen intellectual property rights. Los Angeles Times, December 11, 2001:C3.
18. Shiva V. Biopiracy: The Plunder of Nature and Knowledge. Boston: South End Press, 1997.
19. Basmati patent shrinks. Science 2001;293:1761. Kurtenbach E. Patent application raises worries. Yahoo News, December 12, 2001. Online: dailynews.yahoo.com (no longer available).
20. Svatos M. Patents and licensing, ethics, ownership of animal and plant genes. In: Murray TH, Mehlman MJ, eds. Encyclopedia of Ethical, Legal, and Policy Issues in Biotechnology. Vol. 2. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2000:844–854. Also: Ho CM. International intellectual property issues for biotechnology (2000:761–787).
21. Andrews EL. U.S. resumes granting patents on genetically altered animals. NYT, February 3, 1993:A1,D5. Also see: Rifkin J. The Biotech Century: Harnessing the Gene and Remaking the World. New York: Jeremy P. Tarcher/Putnam, 1998.
22. Thompson PB. Food Biotechnology in Ethical Perspective. London: Blackie Academic, 1997. Bruce D, Bruce A. Engineering Genesis: The Ethics of Genetic Engineering in Non-Human Species. London: Earthscan, 1998. Shiva V. Protect or Plunder: Understanding Intellectual Property Rights. London: Zed Books, 2001.
23. Service RF. Seed-sterilizing “terminator