Safe Food_ Bacteria, Biotechnology, and Bioterrorism - Marion Nestle [49]
The Jack in the Box outbreak was by no means the first to involve E. coli O157:H7, but it was especially difficult for the public to accept. For one thing, children had died. For another, the source was hamburger—an American food icon. From then on, food companies and USDA officials would have a harder time convincing the public of the usual line of reasoning: nothing can be done about pathogens, they are ubiquitous, and the burden of food safety rests with home cooks. The responsibility of producers, processors, and retailers was now apparent, as was that of the government to make sure they met that responsibility.24 Table 9 summarizes the USDA’s subsequent and ongoing vision of how food safety responsibilities are to be shared. It demonstrates that in 1998 the department still could not require farmers or transporters to institute HACCP plans, nor could it demand performance standards—maximum levels of harmful microbes allowed as verified by testing—for reducing pathogens.15
TABLE 9. Advice from the Department of Agriculture: food safety is everyone’s responsibility
Farm
Pathogens are found to some extent in all farm animals.
Livestock operations should be separated from produce operations.
Clean water should be used to irrigate produce.
Storage/Transport
Keep products cold.
Clean tanks between shipments.
Slaughter/Processing
Apply HACCP preventive systems.
New technologies can reduce the risk of pathogen contamination.
Consumer
Clean: Wash hands and surfaces often.
Separate: Don’t cross-contaminate.
Cook: Cook to proper temperatures.
Chill: Refrigerate promptly.
SOURCE: Crutchfield S. FoodReview 1998;21(3):34–35.
Any assumption that either the industry or the USDA would willingly accept such responsibility was overly optimistic. Marian Burros of the New York Times noted that USDA officials continued to deny two obvious facts: cases of food poisoning were increasing, and the meat industry had something to do with those cases. As she explained, “Blaming the victim takes the onus off the responsible government agency and the meat and poultry industry. There are many ways the industry could lessen the risks of food poisoning, but the Government does not require any of those steps.”25
Instead of taking such steps, industry groups employed damage control. They pointed out that E. coli O157:H7 infections were due to undercooking, not to the meat itself, and that consumers needed better education about food safety. They said the “recent outbreak sheds light on a nationwide problem: inconsistent information about proper cooking temperatures for hamburger.