The Box - Marc Levinson [182]
13. Nutter, “The Port of Oakland,” p. 82; Rosenstein, “The Rise of Maritime Containerization,” pp. 98–104.
14. Ting-Li Cho, “A Conceptual Framework for the Physical Development of the Port of Seattle,” Port of Seattle Planning and Research Department, April 1966, p. 15; Arthur D. Little Inc., Community Renewal Programming: A San Francisco Case Study (New York, 1966), p. 34.
15. Rosenstein, “The Rise of Maritime Containerization,” pp. 65 and 85–86; Worden, Cargoes, 148; Nutter, “The Port of Oakland,” pp. 112, 120; Port of Oakland, “1957 Revenue Bonds, Series P, $20,000,000,” October 17, 1978, p. 15; Erie, Globalizing L.A., p. 90; Seattle Port Commission, “Container Terminals 1970–1975: A Development Strategy,” November 1969, pp. 1, 10.
16. Burke, A History of the Port of Seattle, pp. 116, 122; Erie, Globalizing L.A., pp. 85–89; Minor, Pacific Gateway, p. 53; Fitzgerald, “A History of Containerization,” pp. 91–93; Niven, American President Lines, pp. 250–251; Nutter, “The Port of Oakland,” p. 84.
17. U.S. Department of Commerce, Marad, “Review of United States Oceanborne Trade 1966” (Washington, DC, 1967), p. 11.
18. Executive Office of the President, Economic Stabilization Program, Pay Board, “East and Gulf Coast Longshore Contract,” May 2, 1972.
19. Alan F. Schoedel, “Boston Talks in Deadlock,” JOC, June 29, 1966, and “No Progress Reported in Boston Port Dispute,” JOC, November 22, 1966.
20. John R. Immer, Container Services of the Atlantic, 2nd ed. (Washington, DC, 1970), chaps. 14 and 15; Philadelphia Maritime Museum, “Delaware Riever Longshoremen Oral History Project: Background Paper,” Vertical File, ILA Local 1291, Tamiment Labor Archive, New York University; Longshore News, December 1969; Charles F. Davis, “Ports of Philadelphia Posts Impressive Record,” JOC, February 5, 1970; Bremer Ausschuß für Wirtschaftsforschung, Container Facilities and Traffic in 71 Ports of the World Midyear 1910 (Bremen, 1971).
21. Matson Research Corporation, “The Impact of Containerization on the U.S. Economy” (Washington, DC, 1970), 1:88–98.
22. Robert J. McCalla, “From ‘Anyport’ to ‘Superterminal,’ “in Shipping and Ports in the Twenty-first Century, ed. David Pinder and Brian Slack (London, 2004), pp. 130–134; U.S. Department of Commerce, Marad, “Containerized Cargo Statistics Calendar Year 1974” (Washington, DC, 1974), p. 7; Austin J. Tobin, “Political and Economic Implications of Changing Port Concepts,” in Schenker and Brockel, Port Planning and Development, p. 269. On Richmond’s brief experience as a containerport, see John Parr Cox, “Parr Terminal: Fifty Years of Industry on the Richmond Waterfront,” interview by Judith K. Dunning (Berkeley, 1992), pp. 181–183.
23. PNYA, Via—Port of New York, Special Issue: Transatlantic Transport Preview, (1965), pp. 12–16.
24. Anthony G. Hoare, “British Ports and Their Export Hinterlands: A Rapidly Changing Geography,” Geografiska Annaler, Series B. Human Geography 68, no. 1 (1986): 30–32; Fairplay, September 14, 1967, p. 5.
25. Wilson, Dockers, pp. 137, 309.
26. Ibid., pp. 181–191; Anthony J. Tozzoli, “Containerization and Its Impact on Port Development,” Journal of the Waterways, Harbors and Coastal Engineering Division, Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers 98, no. WW3 (1972): 335; Fairplay, May 16, 1968, p. 51.
27. McKinsey & Company, “Containerization: The Key to Low-Cost Transport,” June 1967; A. D. Little, “Containerisation on the North Atlantic,” p. 61; Turnbull, “Contesting Globalization,” pp. 367–391.
28. “Developments in London,” Fairplay, November 17, 1966, p. 29.
29. Wilson, Dockers, p. 239; J. R. Whittaker, Containerization (Washington, DC, 1975), pp. 35–42.
30. Wilson, Dockers, p. 152; Fairplay, July 18, 1968, p. 9.
31. Morrison interview, COHP; “UK Dockers Accept Pay Offer,” JOC, March 23, 1970; Edward A. Morrow, “‘Intermodal’ Fee Stirs a Dispute,” NYT, April 8, 1968; “Shipping Events: Inquiry Barred,” NYT, July 26, 1968.
32. Hoare, “British Ports,” pp. 35–39; D. J. Connolly, “Social Repercussions of New Cargo Handling Methods in