Your Medical Mind_ How to Decide What Is Right for You - Jerome Groopman [97]
13 The availability bias is elegantly described in Amos Tversky, Daniel Kahneman, “The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice,” Science 211 (1981), pp. 453–458.
14 The bias in favor of natural approaches is found in Gretchen B. Chapman, “The psychology of medical decision making ,” in D. J. Koehler and N. Harvey (eds.), Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making (Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing, 2004), pp. 585–603.
15 Loss aversion is described by Daniel Kahneman, Jack L. Knetsch, Richard H. Thaler, “The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 5 (1991), pp. 193–206. Also see Dan Ariely’s lively discussion of loss aversion in Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions (New York : HarperCollins, 2008).
17 There are different risk calculators for heart attack; a reliable site that helped give Susan Powell understandable numbers: United States Department of Health and Human Services/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, “Health Information for the Public,” http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health.
18 The importance of calculating the “number needed to treat” is found in Steven Woloshin, Lisa M. Schwartz, H. Gilbert Welch, Know Your Chances: Understanding Health Statistics (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2008). For more extensive commentary on the interpretation of number needed to treat, see Finlay A. McAlister et al., “Users’ guides to the medical literature. Integrating research evidence with the care of the individual patient,” JAMA 283 (2000), pp. 2829–2836; Finlay A. McAlister, “The ‘number needed to treat’ turns 20—and continues to be used and misused,” CMAJ 179 (2008), pp. 549–553; Christopher A. K. Y. Chong et al., “An unadjusted NNT was a moderately good predictor of health benefit,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 59 (2006), pp. 224–233; Peder Andreas Halvorsen, Ivar Sonbo Kristiansen, “Decisions on drug therapies by numbers needed to treat: A randomized trial,” Archives of Internal Medicine 165 (2005), pp. 1140–1146; J. Nexoe, I. S. Kristiansen, D. Gyrd-Hansen, J. B. Nielsen, “Influence of number needed to treat, costs and outcome on preferences for a preventive drug,” Family Practice 22 (2005), pp. 126–131; Arthur Marx, Heiner C. Bucher, “Numbers needed to treat derived from meta-analysis: A word of caution,” Evidence-Based Medicine 8 (2003), pp. 36–37; Lonne Wen, Robert Badgett, John Cornell, “Number needed to treat: A descriptor