God's Fury, England's Fire_ A New History of the English Civil Wars - Michael J. Braddick [404]
41. Stoyle, Soldiers and Strangers, chs. 1–4; Lloyd Bowen, ‘Representations of Wales and the Welsh during the Civil Wars and Interregnum’, Historical Research, 77 (2004), 358–76; Joad Raymond, Pamphlets and Pamphleteering in Early Modern Britain (Cambridge, 2003), pp. 220–22.
42. A&O, I, pp. 554–5.
43. A point also made by Bowen, ‘Representations of Wales’, p. 365; See also Barbara Donagan, ‘Codes and Conduct in the English Civil War’, PP, 118 (1988), 65–96, at pp. 93–4.
44. Peter Young and Richard Holmes, The English Civil War: A Military History of the Three Civil Wars 1642–1651 (Ware, 2000), pp. 146–9; Malcolm Wanklyn, Decisive Battles of the English Civil War: Myth and Reality (Barnsley, 2006), chs. 6–7; Wanklyn and Jones, Military History, ch. 11.
45. Gardiner, I, p. 237.
46. For royalist strategy in this period see Wanklyn and Jones, Military History, ch. 12. For the fighting See also Young and Holmes, English Civil War, pp. 151–64; for Hopton’s injury see ibid., pp. 130–31.
47. A&O, I, pp. 333–9; Gardiner, I, pp. 250–52.
48. Clive Holmes, The Eastern Association in the English Civil War (Cambridge, 1974), esp. chs. 5–8.
49. Gardiner, I, pp. 238, 253, 294; and see above, p. 316.
11. Marston Moor
1. For the speeches, see above, pp. 92, 125–6.
2. Gardiner, I, p. 250; D. E. Kennedy, The English Revolution 1642–1649 (Basingstoke, 2000), p. 37.
3. Wallace Notestein, ‘The Establishment of the Committee of Both Kingdoms’, AHR, 17 (1912), 477–95; Lotte Glow, ‘The Committee of Safety’, EHR, 80 (1965), 289–313; John Adamson, ‘The Triumph of Oligarchy: The Management of War and the Committee of Both Kingdoms, 1644–1645’, in Chris R. Kyle and Jason Peacey (eds.), Parliament at Work: Parliamentary Committees, Political Power and Public Access in Early Modern England (Woodbridge, 2002), pp. 101–27.
4. Gardiner, I, pp. 301–2; Edward Vallance, ‘Protestation, Vow, Covenant and Engagement: Swearing Allegiance in the English Civil War’, Historical Research, 75 (2002), 408–24, at pp. 417–22.
5. Gardiner, I, pp. 246–7; Anthony Milton, ‘Laud, William (1573–1645)’, ODNB, 32, pp. 655–70.
6. Gardiner, I, pp. 273–4. For the Brooke plot see above, p. 316.
7. Peter Young and Richard Holmes, The English Civil War: A Military History of the Three Civil Wars, 1642–1651 (Ware, 2000), pp. 167–71; Malcolm Wanklyn and Frank Jones, A Military History of the English Civil War, 1642–1646: Strategy and Tactics (Harlow, 2005), ch. 13; Malcolm Wanklyn, Decisive Battles of the English Civil War: Myth and Reality (Barnsley, 2006), chs. 8–9.
8. Wanklyn and Jones, Military History, ch. 13 and pp. 157–62.
9. Young and Holmes, English Civil War, p. 181.
10. Ibid., pp. 175–80.
11. Wanklyn and Jones, Military History, pp. 162–5; Young and Holmes, English Civil War, pp. 181–4; Gardiner, I, pp. 331, 352–3; for the Oxford parliament and its place in royalist politics see Richard Cust, Charles I: A Political Life (Harlow, 2005), pp. 381–4.
12. Wanklyn and Jones, Military History, pp. 165–6; Young and Holmes, English Civil War, pp. 184–5; Gardiner, I, pp. 358–62.
13. Wanklyn and Jones, Military History, pp. 166–9; Young and Holmes, English Civil War, pp. 185–9.
14. Wanklyn and Jones, Military History, ch. 15; Young and Holmes, English Civil War, pp. 190–91; Gardiner, I, p. 370.
15. Gardiner, I, p. 371, emphasis added.
16. Ibid., emphasis added.
17. Ibid.; Wanklyn and Jones, Military History, pp. 178–80.
18. For the following three paragraphs see Young and Holmes, English Civil War, pp. 193–203; Wanklyn and Jones, Military History, ch. 16; Wanklyn, Decisive Battles, chs. 10–11; Gardiner, I, pp. 374–82. For an account emphasizing the importance of Cromwell’s actions, see Frank Kitson, Old Ironsides: The Military Biography of Oliver Cromwell (London, 2004), pp. 380–90. Wanklyn is sceptical about the influence on the course of the battle of the rabbit holes which marked parts of the field: Decisive