School Choice or Best Systems_ What Improves Education_ - Margaret C. Wang [59]
37 Ibid., p. 20.
38 Daniel P. Mayer, Paul E. Peterson, David E. Myers, Christina Clark Tuttle, and William G. Howell, “School Choice in New York City after Three Years: An Evaluation of the School Choice Scholarships Program,” Mathematica Policy Research, February 2002, cited in Government Accountability Office, p. 21.
39 John F. Witte, The Market Approach to Education: An Analysis of America’s First Voucher Program (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000), Table 4.3, p. 63.
40 Terry M. Moe, Private Vouchers (Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press, 1995).
41 F. Mikael Sandström and Fredrick Bergström, “School Vouchers in Practice: Competition Won’t Hurt You!” Journal of Public Economics 89, nos. 2-3 (2005): 351-80. See also Fredrick Bergström and F. Mikael Sandström, School Choice Works: The Case of Sweden (Indianapolis, IN: Milton and Rose D. Friedman Foundation, 2003).
42 Andrew Coulson, “Market Education and Its Critics: Testing School Choice Criticisms against the International Evidence,” in What America Can Learn from School Choice in Other Countries, ed. David Salisbury and James Tooley (Washington: Cato Institute, 2005), p. 152.
43 H. M. Patrinos, “Private Education Provision and Public Finance: The Netherlands as a Possible Model,” National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education Occasional Paper no. 59, 2002; and G. Walford, “Funding for Private Schools in England and the Netherlands: Can the Piper Call the Tune?” National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education, 2000; both cited in Clive R. Belfield and Henry M. Levin, Education Privatization: Causes, Consequences, and Planning Implications (Paris: UNESCO/International Institute for Educational Planning, 2002), p. 57.
44 J. D. Levin, “Essays in the Economics of Education,” Tinbergen Institute (Amsterdam) Research Series, 2002, cited in Belfield and Levin, p. 57.
45 Belfield and Levin, p. 58.
46 Ibid., p. 53; and Claudio Sapelli, “The Chilean Education Voucher System,” in What America Can Learn from School Choice in Other Countries, p. 41.
47 Patrick J. McEwan, “The Effectiveness of Public, Catholic, and non-Religious Private Schools in Chile’s Voucher System, Education Economics 9 (2001): 103-28, cited in Belfield and. Levin, pp. 53-54.
48 Sapelli, p. 58.
49 Ibid., p. 55.
50 Andrew J. Coulson, “How Markets Affect Quality,” in Educational Freedom in Urban America: Brown v. Board after Half a Century, ed. David Salisbury and Casey Lartigue (Washington: Cato Institute, 2004), http://www.schoolchoices.org/roo/How_Markets_Affect_Quality.pdf. See also Francisco A Gallego, “Competencia y Resultados Educativos: Theoría y Evidencia para Chile,” Central Bank of Chile Working Paper no. 150, April 2002.
51 Belfield and Levin, p. 54.
52 Ibid.
Chapter 4
1 See Herbert J. Walberg and Joseph L. Bast, Capitalism and Education (Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press, 2003), pp. 54-60.
2 James A. Johnson, Harold W. Collins, Victor L. Dupuis, and John H. Johansen, Introduction to the Foundations of American Education, 6th ed. (Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1985).
3 John T. Wenders, “The Extent and Nature of Waste and Rent Dissatisfaction in U.S. Public Schools” Cato Journal 25 (2005): 222.
4 James S. Coleman, “Public Schools, Private Schools, and the Public Interest,” Public Interest 64 (Summer 1981).
5 Martha Naomi Alt and Katherine Peter, “Private Schools: A Brief Portrait,” in The Condition of Education 2002 (Washington: U.S. Department of Education, 2002).
6 “Enrollments of Private High School Students in Elite Colleges and Universities,” Wall Street Journal, September 15, 2006, p. W10.
7 Henry Braun, Frank Jenkins, and Wendy Grigg, “Comparing Private Schools and Public Schools Using Hierarchical Linear Models,” U.S. Department of Education Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, NCES 2006- 461, 2006.
8 Paul E. Peterson and Elena Llaudet, “On the Public-Private School Achievement Debate,” paper presented at the meetings of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia,