School Choice or Best Systems_ What Improves Education_ - Margaret C. Wang [62]
45 Priyanka Anand, Alejandra Mizala, and Andea Repetto, Using Scholarships to Estimate the Effect of Government Subsidized Private Education on Academic Achievement in Chile (Washington: American Institutes for Research, 2006).
Chapter 5
1 Paul Teske and Mark Schneider, “What Research Can Tell Policymakers about School Choice,” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 20 (Fall 2001): 609-31.
2 Ibid., p. 609.
3 Ibid., abstract.
4 Ibid., p. 619.
5 Clive R. Belfield and Henry M. Levin, The Effects of Competition on Educational Outcomes: A Review of U.S. Evidence (New York: National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education, Teachers College, Columbia University, September 2001), p. 1, http://www.ncspe.org/keepout/papers/00035/585_OP35.pdf .
6 Ibid., Table 1, “Summary of the Effects of Increases in Competition by One Standard Deviation,” p. 47.
7 Ludger Woessman, “Why Students in Some Countries Do Better,” Education Next, no. 2 (2001): 5, http://www.educationnext.org/20012/67.html.
8 Ibid., p. 2.
9 Ibid., p. 11.
10 Jay P. Greene, “Education Freedom Index,” Manhattan Institute Civic Report no. 14, September 2000, http://www.manhattan-institute.org/html/cr_14.htm.
11 Ibid.
12 Andrew J. Coulson, “The Cato Education Market Index” Cato Institute Policy Analysis no. 585, December 13, 2006, p. 20.
13 Charles Tiebout, “A Pure Theory of Local Public Expenditures,” Journal of Political Economy 64 (1956): 416-24.
14 For a recent review of Tiebout competition among jurisdictions and schools, see William Fischel, “The Courts and Public School Finance: Judge-Made Centralization and Economic Research” in Handbook on the Economics of Education, ed. Eric Hanushek and Finis Welch (London: Elsevier, forthcoming).
15 Herbert J. Walberg and Herbert J. Walberg III, “Losing Local Control,” Educational Researcher, June-July 1993, pp.19-26. See also Herbert J. Walberg, “Losing Local Control of Education: Cost and Quality Implications,” Heartland Institute Policy Brief no. 59, November 22, 1993, http://www.heartland.org/pdf//21764i.pdf.
16 Melvin V. Borland and Roy M. Howsen, “On the Determination of the Critical Level of Market Concentration in Education,” Economics of Education Review 12, no. 2 (1993): abstract.
17 Albert O. Hirschman used this index earlier, and subsequently it is termed the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index.
18 Lisa Barrow and Cecilia Elena Rouse, “Using Market Valuation to Assess the Importance and Efficiency of Public School Spending,” paper presented at Annual Meeting of the American Educational Finance Association, in Econometric Society, Econometric Society World Congress 2000 Contributed Papers series, no. 1446, 2000, http://ideas.repec.org/s/ecm/wc2000.html.
19 Clive R. Belfield and Henry M. Levin, The Effects of Competition on Educational Outcomes: A Review of U.S. Evidence (New York: National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education, Teachers College, Columbia University, March 2002).
20 Caroline M. Hoxby, “How School Choice Affects the Achievement of Public School Students,” in Choice with Equity, ed. Paul T. Hill (Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press, 2002), pp. 141-78.
21 Ibid., Table 8, “Effect of Traditional Inter-District Choice on Public School Students’ Achievement,” p. 173.
22 Jay P. Greene and Marcus A. Winters, “The Effect of Residential School Choice on Public High School Graduation Rates,” Manhattan Institute Education Working Paper no. 9, April 2005.
23 David Tyack, The One Best System: A History of American Urban Education (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1974); and David Tyack and Larry Cuban, Tinkering toward Utopia: A Century of Public School Reform (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995).
24 National Center for Education Statistics, Digest of Education Statistics Tables and Figures 2003, Table 85, “Number of Public School Districts and Public and Private Elementary Schools: Selected Years, 1869-70 to 2001-02,” http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d03/tables/dt085.asp.