Spycraft - Melton [294]
10 James Van Stappen, “Graphological Assessment in Action,” Studies in Intelligence, 3:4, Central Intelligence Agency, 1959, 49-58.
11 Keith Laycock, “Handwriting Analysis as an Assessment Aid,” Studies in Intelligence (Washington, DC: Central Intelligence Agency, 1959) vol 3:3 (1959), 27.
12 E. A. Rundquist, “The Assessment of Graphology,” Studies in Intelligence, 3:3, Central Intelligence Agency, 1959, 45-51.
13 Former DDP and DCI Richard Helms in A Look over My Shoulder, 426, commented that the studies “proved a useful extension of the routine diplomatic and military reporting.” Former DDO and DCI William Colby in Honorable Men—My Life in the CIA (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1978), 335, cited “psychological advice on how to handle alien agents” as an important TSD capability. OTS deployed psychologists to field bases to support requirements at CIA offices throughout the world. At Headquarters OTS devoted one or more full-time operational psychologists to handle the caseloads in high demand operational components such as the Soviet and Far East Divisions and the Counterterrorism Center.
14 John Waller, “The Myth of the Rogue Elephant Interred,” Studies in Intelligence, 22:2 Central Intelligence Agency, 1978, 6.
15 Allen Dulles, “Brain Warfare,” speech to the National Alumni Conference of the Graduate Council of Princeton University, Hot Springs, VA, April 10, 1953.
16 See: DCI Stansfield Turner’s 1977 testimony. The DCI grouped MKULTRA’s 149 subprojects into three categories: (1) Research into behavior modification, drug acquisition, and testing and clandestine administration of drugs; (2) financial and cover mechanisms for each of the subprojects; (3) subprojects, of which there were thirty-three, funded under the MKULTRA umbrella but unrelated to behavioral modification, drugs, or toxins. Polygraph research and control of animal activity were examples offered. The process to completely phase out all of the MKULTRA projects required several years.
17 Michael Edwards, “The Sphinx and the Spy: The Clandestine World of John Mulholland,” Genii: The Conjurorsí Magazine. April 2001, see: http://www. frankolsonproject.org/Articles/Mulholland.html
18 Ibid.
19 Letter to Dr. Sidney Gottlieb, Central Intelligence Agency, MKULTRA document 4-29, April 20, 1953.
20 Ibid.
21 Edwards, “The Sphinx and the Spy.”
22 Mulholland letter to Sidney Gottlieb, Central Intelligence Agency, MKULTRA document 19-2, November 11, 1953.
23 Memorandum for the Record, Project MKULTRA, Subproject 34, Central Intelligence Agency, MKULTRA document 34-46, October 1, 1954.
24 Edwards, “The Sphinx and the Spy.”
25 Memorandum for the Record, Project MKULTRA, Subproject 34, Central Intelligence Agency, MKULTRA document 34-46, October 1, 1954.
26 Memorandum for the Record, Definition of a Task under MKULTRA, Subproject 34, Central Intelligence Agency, MKULTRA document 34-39, August 25, 1955.
27 Memorandum for the Record, MKULTRA, Subproject 34, Central Intelligence Agency, MKULTRA document 34-29, June 20, 1956.
28 Edwards, “The Sphinx and the Spy.”
29 Memorandum for the Record, Central Intelligence Agency, MKULTRA document 8312, March 26, 1959.
30 In 1962, Dr. Gottlieb, who had been Chief of R&D for TSD, was promoted to Deputy Chief/TSD under Seymour Russell. Richard Krueger replaced Dr. Gottlieb as Chief of R&D for TSD but was not initially briefed on any of the MKULTRA projects, which continued to report to Gottlieb. Following the IG report, however, Krueger was “read into the program” and developed a process for phasing out over three years all remaining projects. Three years were required to close down the projects through orderly steps that would not expose the covert relationships or compromise the security of the participating